SIROLIMUS tablet
For Healthcare Providers >

1. Patient Information
2. Sirolimus Can Cause Serious Side Effects, Including:
3. Sirolimus Is Used With Other Medicines Called Cyclosporine (gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune), And Corticosteroids. Your Doctor Will Decide:
4. Who Should Not Take Sirolimus?
5. Especially Tell Your Doctor If You Take:
6. How Should I Take Sirolimus?
7. What Should I Avoid While Taking Sirolimus?
8. Sirolimus Tablets:
9. What Are The Ingredients In Sirolimus Tablets?

Patient Information ⮝

Advise patients, their families, and their caregivers to read the Medication Guide and assist them in understanding its contents. The complete text of the Medication Guide is reprinted at the end of the document.

SeeFDA-Approved Medication Guide.

17.1 Dosage

Patients should be given complete dosage instructions [seeFDA-Approved Medication Guide].

17.2 Skin Cancer Events

Patients should be told that exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) light should be limited by wearing protective clothing and using a sunscreen with a high protection factor because of the increased risk for skin cancer [seeWarnings and Precautions (5.17)].

17.3 Pregnancy Risks

Women of childbearing potential should be informed of the potential risks during pregnancy and told that they should use effective contraception prior to initiation of sirolimus therapy, during sirolimus therapy, and for 12 weeks after sirolimus therapy has been stopped [seeUse in Specific Populations (8.1)].

Sirolimus Can Cause Serious Side Effects, Including: ⮝

1. Increased risk of getting infections.Serious infections can happen including infections caused by viruses, bacteria, and fungi (yeast). Your doctor may put you on medicine to help prevent some of these infections.

Call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of infection including fever or chills while taking sirolimus.

2. Increased risk of getting certain cancers.People who take sirolimus have a higher risk of getting lymphoma, and other cancers, especially skin cancer. Talk with your doctor about your risk for cancer.

Sirolimus has not been shown to be safe and effective in people who have had liver or lung transplants. Serious complications and death may happen in people who take sirolimus after a liver or lung transplant.You should not take sirolimus if you have had a liver or lung transplant without talking with your doctor.

Sirolimus is a prescription medicine used to prevent rejection (anti-rejection medicine) in people 13 years of age and older who have received a kidney transplant. Rejection is when your body's immune system recognizes the new organ as a "foreign" threat and attacks it.

Sirolimus Is Used With Other Medicines Called Cyclosporine (gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune), And Corticosteroids. Your Doctor Will Decide: ⮝

• if sirolimus is right for you, and
• how to best use it with cyclosporine and corticosteroids after your transplant.

It is not known if sirolimus is safe and effective in children under 13 years of age.

Who Should Not Take Sirolimus? ⮝

Do not take sirolimus tablets if you are allergic to sirolimus or any of the other ingredients in sirolimus tablets.

• have liver problems
• have skin cancer or it runs in your family
• have high cholesterol or triglycerides (fat in your blood)
• are pregnant or are a female who can become pregnant. Sirolimus may harm your unborn baby. You should not become pregnant during treatment with sirolimus and for 12 weeks after ending treatment with sirolimus tablets. In order to avoid pregnancy, a female who can get pregnant should use effective birth control during treatment and for 12 weeks after your final dose of sirolimus tablets. Talk with your doctor about what birth control method is right for you during this time. Tell your doctor right away if you become pregnant or think you are pregnant during treatment with sirolimus or within 12 weeks after your final dose of sirolimus tablets.
• It is not known whether sirolimus passes into breast milk. You and your doctor should decide if you will take sirolimus or breastfeed. You should not do both.

Tell your doctor about all the medicines you take,including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements. Using sirolimus with certain medicines may affect each other causing serious side effects.

Sirolimus may affect the way other medicines work, and other medicines may affect how sirolimus works.

Especially Tell Your Doctor If You Take: ⮝

• a medicine to lower your cholesterol or triglycerides
• cyclosporine (including Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune) or tacrolimus (Prograf) or other medicines that suppress the immune system
• an antibiotic
• an antifungal medicine
• a medicine for high blood pressure or heart problems
• an anti-seizure medicine
• medicines used to treat stomach acid, ulcers, or other gastrointestinal problems
• bromocriptine mesylate (Parlodel, Cycloset)
• danazol
• medicines to treat HIV or hepatitis C
• St. John's Wort

How Should I Take Sirolimus? ⮝

• Take sirolimus exactly as your doctor tells you to take it.
• Your doctor will tell you how much sirolimus to take and when to take it. Do not change your dose of sirolimus unless your doctor tells you to.
• If you also take cyclosporine (Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune), you should take your sirolimus and cyclosporine about 4 hours apart.
• Do not stop taking sirolimus or your other anti-rejection medicines unless your doctor tells you to.
• Your doctor will check the levels of sirolimus in your blood. Your doctor may change your dose of sirolimus depending on your blood test results.
• Sirolimus is taken by mouth 1 time each day.
• Do not crush, chew, or split sirolimus tablets. Tell your doctor if you cannot swallow sirolimus tablets. Your doctor can prescribe sirolimus as a solution.
• Take each dose of sirolimus the same way, either with or without food. Food can affect the amount of medicine that gets into your bloodstream. Taking each dose of sirolimus the same way helps keep your blood levels of sirolimus more stable. Do not take sirolimus with grapefruit juice.
• If you have taken more medicine than you were told, contact a doctor or go to the nearest hospital emergency department right away.

What Should I Avoid While Taking Sirolimus? ⮝

• Avoid receiving live vaccines while taking sirolimus. Some vaccines may not work as well while you are taking sirolimus.
• Limit your time in sunlight and UV light. Cover your skin with clothing and use a sunscreen with a high protection factor because of the increased risk for skin cancer with sirolimus.

Sirolimus Tablets: ⮝

• Store sirolimus tablets at 20 to 25 C (68 to 77 F).

Safely throw away medicine that is out of date or no longer needed.

Keep sirolimus and all medicines out of the reach of children.

General Information about the safe and effective use of sirolimus.
Medicines are sometimes prescribed for purposes other than those listed in a Medication Guide. Do not use sirolimus for a condition for which it was not prescribed. Do not give sirolimus to other people even if they have the same symptoms that you have. It may harm them.

This Medication Guide summarizes the most important information about sirolimus. If you would like more information talk to your doctor. You can ask your pharmacist or doctor for information about sirolimus that is written for health professionals.

For more information, call 1-888-375-3784.

What Are The Ingredients In Sirolimus Tablets? ⮝

Active ingredient: sirolimus
Inactive ingredients: Sirolimus Tablets: carnauba wax, ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 5 cps, lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate, mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose (avicel pH 105), microcrystalline cellulose (avicel pH 200), poloxamer 188, polyethylene glycol 20000, polyethylene glycol 8000, sucrose, titanium dioxide, vitamin E preparation, seal coating agent opaglos clear NA 7150, and imprinting ink opacode red (S-1-15052). The 2 mg dosage strength also contains iron oxide red and iron oxide yellow.

Seal coating agent opaglos clear NA 7150 contains, acetylated monoglyceride, industrial methylated spirit 74 OP, povidone, and shellac.

Imprinting ink opacode red (S-1-15052) contains, ammonium hydroxide, FD&C Red # 40, propylene glycol, shellac glaze, and titanium dioxide.

This Medication Guide has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Rx Only

Distributed by:
American Health Packaging
Columbus, OH 4321

8291521/0918

1. No Title 1572553642
2. See Full Prescribing Information For Complete Boxed Warning.
3. Warning: Immunosuppression, Use Is Not Recommended In Liver Or Lung Transplant Patients
4. No Title 1572451901
5. Warning: Immunosuppression, Use Is Not Recommended In Liver Or Lung Transplant Patients
6. See Full Prescribing Information For Complete Boxed Warning.
7. 5 Warnings And Precautions
8. Packaging Information
9. Package/label Display Panel Carton 1 Mg
10. Package/label Display Panel Blister 1 Mg
11. Highlights Of Prescribing Information
12. Warning: Immunosuppression, Use Is Not Recommended In Liver Or Lung Transplant Patients
13. See Full Prescribing Information For Complete Boxed Warning.
14. Recent Major Changes
15. Indications And Usage
16. Dosage And Administration
17. Dosage Forms And Strengths
18. Contraindications
19. Warnings And Precautions
20. Adverse Reactions
21. Drug Interactions
22. Use In Specific Populations
23. 1 Indications And Usage
24. 2 Dosage And Administration
25. 3 Dosage Forms And Strengths
26. 4 Contraindications
27. 5 Warnings And Precautions
28. 6 Adverse Reactions
29. 7 Drug Interactions
30. 8 Use In Specific Populations
31. 10 Overdosage
32. 11 Description
33. 12 Clinical Pharmacology
34. 13 Nonclinical Toxicology
35. 14 Clinical Studies
36. 15 References
37. 16 How Supplied/storage And Handling
38. Package Label. Principal Display Panel

No Title 1572553642 ⮝

Sirolimus Tablets, 2 mg Container Label

Unvarnished Area Consists of: 2D Barcode, Lot Number, Expiry Date and Serial Number

SIROLIMUS sirolimus tablet

Product Information Product Type HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG Item Code (Source) NDC:55111-653 Route of Administration ORAL

Active Ingredient/Active Moiety Ingredient Name Basis of Strength Strength sirolimus (UNII: W36ZG6FT64) (sirolimus - UNII:W36ZG6FT64) sirolimus 1 mg

Inactive Ingredients Ingredient Name Strength carnauba wax (UNII: R12CBM0EIZ) ethylcelluloses (UNII: 7Z8S9VYZ4B) hypromellose 2910 (5 MPA.S) (UNII: R75537T0T4) lactose monohydrate (UNII: EWQ57Q8I5X) magnesium stearate (UNII: 70097M6I30) mannitol (UNII: 3OWL53L36A) poloxamer 188 (UNII: LQA7B6G8JG) cellulose, microcrystalline (UNII: OP1R32D61U) Polyethylene Glycol, Unspecified (UNII: 3WJQ0SDW1A) sucrose (UNII: C151H8M554) titanium dioxide (UNII: 15FIX9V2JP) alpha-tocopherol (UNII: H4N855PNZ1) povidone (UNII: FZ989GH94E) shellac (UNII: 46N107B71O) ammonia (UNII: 5138Q19F1X) FD&C Red No. 40 (UNII: WZB9127XOA) propylene glycol (UNII: 6DC9Q167V3)

Product Characteristics Color WHITE Score no score Shape TRIANGLE Size 5mm Flavor Imprint Code RD53 Contains

Packaging # Item Code Package Description Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date 1 NDC:55111-653-30 30 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014 2 NDC:55111-653-01 100 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014

Marketing Information Marketing Category Application Number or Monograph Citation Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date ANDA ANDA201578 10/27/2014

SIROLIMUS sirolimus tablet

Product Information Product Type HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG Item Code (Source) NDC:55111-654 Route of Administration ORAL

Active Ingredient/Active Moiety Ingredient Name Basis of Strength Strength sirolimus (UNII: W36ZG6FT64) (sirolimus - UNII:W36ZG6FT64) sirolimus 2 mg

Inactive Ingredients Ingredient Name Strength carnauba wax (UNII: R12CBM0EIZ) ethylcelluloses (UNII: 7Z8S9VYZ4B) hypromellose 2910 (5 MPA.S) (UNII: R75537T0T4) lactose monohydrate (UNII: EWQ57Q8I5X) magnesium stearate (UNII: 70097M6I30) mannitol (UNII: 3OWL53L36A) poloxamer 188 (UNII: LQA7B6G8JG) cellulose, microcrystalline (UNII: OP1R32D61U) Polyethylene Glycol, Unspecified (UNII: 3WJQ0SDW1A) sucrose (UNII: C151H8M554) titanium dioxide (UNII: 15FIX9V2JP) alpha-tocopherol (UNII: H4N855PNZ1) ferric oxide red (UNII: 1K09F3G675) ferric oxide yellow (UNII: EX438O2MRT) povidone (UNII: FZ989GH94E) shellac (UNII: 46N107B71O) ammonia (UNII: 5138Q19F1X) FD&C Red No. 40 (UNII: WZB9127XOA) propylene glycol (UNII: 6DC9Q167V3)

Product Characteristics Color YELLOW (creamish yellow) Score no score Shape TRIANGLE Size 5mm Flavor Imprint Code RD54 Contains

Packaging # Item Code Package Description Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date 1 NDC:55111-654-30 30 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014 2 NDC:55111-654-01 100 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014

Marketing Information Marketing Category Application Number or Monograph Citation Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date ANDA ANDA201578 10/27/2014

Labeler - Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited (650562841)

Establishment
Name	Address	ID/FEI	Business Operations
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited - FTO 7		650446243	analysis(55111-653, 55111-654) , manufacture(55111-653, 55111-654)

Revised: 7/2019 Document Id: a216e529-3145-b738-1def-430d3fb63104 34391-3 Set id: 2e6130e5-fa94-dcf8-605c-817bf396e93d Version: 14 Effective Time: 20190726 Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited

See Full Prescribing Information For Complete Boxed Warning.  ⮝

• Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies may result from immunosuppression (5.1). Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants.
• The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended(5.2, 5.3).

- Liver Transplantation Excess mortality, graft loss, and hepatic artery thrombosis (5.2).

- Lung Transplantation Bronchial anastomotic dehiscence (5.3).

Warning: Immunosuppression, Use Is Not Recommended In Liver Or Lung Transplant Patients  ⮝

• Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies may result from immunosuppression

Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma may result from immunosuppression.Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants. Patients receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible for maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ]

• The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.3)].
• Liver Transplantation Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT)

The use of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus was associated with excess mortality and graft loss in a study in de novo liver transplant patients. Many of these patients had evidence of infection at or near the time of death.

In this and another study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus was associated with an increase in HAT; most cases of HAT occurred within 30 days post- transplantation and most led to graft loss or death [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

• Lung Transplantation Bronchial Anastomotic Dehiscence

Cases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in de novo lung transplant patients when sirolimus has been used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen [see Warnings and Precautions(5.3)].

No Title 1572451901 ⮝

Sirolimus Tablets, 2 mg Container Label

Unvarnished Area Consists of: 2D Barcode, Lot Number, Expiry Date and Serial Number

SIROLIMUS sirolimus tablet

Product Information Product Type HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG Item Code (Source) NDC:55111-653 Route of Administration ORAL

Active Ingredient/Active Moiety Ingredient Name Basis of Strength Strength sirolimus (UNII: W36ZG6FT64) (sirolimus - UNII:W36ZG6FT64) sirolimus 1 mg

Inactive Ingredients Ingredient Name Strength carnauba wax (UNII: R12CBM0EIZ) ethylcelluloses (UNII: 7Z8S9VYZ4B) hypromellose 2910 (5 MPA.S) (UNII: R75537T0T4) lactose monohydrate (UNII: EWQ57Q8I5X) magnesium stearate (UNII: 70097M6I30) mannitol (UNII: 3OWL53L36A) poloxamer 188 (UNII: LQA7B6G8JG) cellulose, microcrystalline (UNII: OP1R32D61U) Polyethylene Glycol, Unspecified (UNII: 3WJQ0SDW1A) sucrose (UNII: C151H8M554) titanium dioxide (UNII: 15FIX9V2JP) alpha-tocopherol (UNII: H4N855PNZ1) povidone (UNII: FZ989GH94E) shellac (UNII: 46N107B71O) ammonia (UNII: 5138Q19F1X) FD&C Red No. 40 (UNII: WZB9127XOA) propylene glycol (UNII: 6DC9Q167V3)

Product Characteristics Color WHITE Score no score Shape TRIANGLE Size 5mm Flavor Imprint Code RD53 Contains

Packaging # Item Code Package Description Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date 1 NDC:55111-653-30 30 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014 2 NDC:55111-653-01 100 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014

Marketing Information Marketing Category Application Number or Monograph Citation Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date ANDA ANDA201578 10/27/2014

SIROLIMUS sirolimus tablet

Product Information Product Type HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG Item Code (Source) NDC:55111-654 Route of Administration ORAL

Active Ingredient/Active Moiety Ingredient Name Basis of Strength Strength sirolimus (UNII: W36ZG6FT64) (sirolimus - UNII:W36ZG6FT64) sirolimus 2 mg

Inactive Ingredients Ingredient Name Strength carnauba wax (UNII: R12CBM0EIZ) ethylcelluloses (UNII: 7Z8S9VYZ4B) hypromellose 2910 (5 MPA.S) (UNII: R75537T0T4) lactose monohydrate (UNII: EWQ57Q8I5X) magnesium stearate (UNII: 70097M6I30) mannitol (UNII: 3OWL53L36A) poloxamer 188 (UNII: LQA7B6G8JG) cellulose, microcrystalline (UNII: OP1R32D61U) Polyethylene Glycol, Unspecified (UNII: 3WJQ0SDW1A) sucrose (UNII: C151H8M554) titanium dioxide (UNII: 15FIX9V2JP) alpha-tocopherol (UNII: H4N855PNZ1) ferric oxide red (UNII: 1K09F3G675) ferric oxide yellow (UNII: EX438O2MRT) povidone (UNII: FZ989GH94E) shellac (UNII: 46N107B71O) ammonia (UNII: 5138Q19F1X) FD&C Red No. 40 (UNII: WZB9127XOA) propylene glycol (UNII: 6DC9Q167V3)

Product Characteristics Color YELLOW (creamish yellow) Score no score Shape TRIANGLE Size 5mm Flavor Imprint Code RD54 Contains

Packaging # Item Code Package Description Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date 1 NDC:55111-654-30 30 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014 2 NDC:55111-654-01 100 in 1 BOTTLE; Type 0: Not a Combination Product 10/27/2014

Marketing Information Marketing Category Application Number or Monograph Citation Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date ANDA ANDA201578 10/27/2014

Labeler - Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited (650562841)

Establishment
Name	Address	ID/FEI	Business Operations
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited - FTO 7		650446243	analysis(55111-653, 55111-654) , manufacture(55111-653, 55111-654)

Revised: 7/2019 Document Id: a216e529-3145-b738-1def-430d3fb63104 34391-3 Set id: 2e6130e5-fa94-dcf8-605c-817bf396e93d Version: 14 Effective Time: 20190726 Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited

Warning: Immunosuppression, Use Is Not Recommended In Liver Or Lung Transplant Patients ⮝

• Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies may result from immunosuppression

Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma may result from immunosuppression. Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants. Patients receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible for maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

• The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.3)].
• Liver Transplantation Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT)

The use of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus was associated with excess mortality and graft loss in a study in de novo liver transplant patients. Many of these patients had evidence of infection at or near the time of death.

In this and another study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus was associated with an increase in HAT; most cases of HAT occurred within 30 days post-transplantation and most led to graft loss or death [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

• Lung Transplantation Bronchial Anastomotic Dehiscence

Cases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in de novo lung transplant patients when sirolimus has been used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].

See Full Prescribing Information For Complete Boxed Warning. ⮝

• Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies may result from immunosuppression ( 5.1). Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants.
• The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended ( 5.2, 5.3).
• Liver Transplantation Excess mortality, graft loss, and hepatic artery thrombosis ( 5.2).
• Lung Transplantation Bronchial anastomotic dehiscence ( 5.3).

5 Warnings And Precautions ⮝

5.1 Increased Susceptibility to Infection and the Possible Development of Lymphoma

Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies, particularly of the skin, may result from immunosuppression. The rates of lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disease observed in Studies 1 and 2 were 0.7 to 3.2% (for sirolimus-treated patients) versus 0.6 to 0.8% (azathioprine and placebo control) [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) and (6.2)]. Oversuppression of the immune system can also increase susceptibility to infection, including opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis, fatal infections, and sepsis. Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of organ transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants. Patients receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible for maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient.

5.2 Liver Transplantation Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended. The use of sirolimus has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients following liver transplantation, including excess mortality, graft loss and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT).

In a study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus was associated with excess mortality and graft loss (22% in combination versus 9% on tacrolimus alone). Many of these patients had evidence of infection at or near the time of death.

In this and another study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus was associated with an increase in HAT (7% in combination versus 2% in the control arm); most cases of HAT occurred within 30 days post-transplantation, and most led to graft loss or death.

In a clinical study in stable liver transplant patients 6 to 144 months post-liver transplantation and receiving a CNI-based regimen, an increased number of deaths was observed in the group converted to a sirolimus-based regimen compared to the group who was continued on a CNI-based regimen, although the difference was not statistically significant (3.8% versus 1.4%) [see Clinical Studies (14.5)].

5.3 Lung Transplantation Bronchial Anastomotic Dehiscence

Cases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in de novo lung transplant patients when sirolimus has been used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen.

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in lung transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended.

5.4 Hypersensitivity Reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema, exfoliative dermatitis and hypersensitivity vasculitis, have been associated with the administration of sirolimus [see Adverse Reactions (6.7)].

5.5 Angioedema

Sirolimus has been associated with the development of angioedema. The concomitant use of sirolimus with other drugs known to cause angioedema, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, may increase the risk of developing angioedema. Elevated sirolimus levels (with/without concomitant ACE inhibitors) may also potentiate angioedema [see Drug Interactions (7.2)]. In some cases, the angioedema has resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus.

5.6 Fluid Accumulation and Impairment of Wound Healing

There have been reports of impaired or delayed wound healing in patients receiving sirolimus, including lymphocele and wound dehiscence [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as sirolimus have been shown in vitro to inhibit production of certain growth factors that may affect angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and vascular permeability. Lymphocele, a known surgical complication of renal transplantation, occurred significantly more often in a dose-related fashion in patients treated with sirolimus [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Appropriate measures should be considered to minimize such complications. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m 2 may be at increased risk of abnormal wound healing based on data from the medical literature.

There have also been reports of fluid accumulation, including peripheral edema, lymphedema, pleural effusion, ascites, and pericardial effusions (including hemodynamically significant effusions and tamponade requiring intervention in children and adults), in patients receiving sirolimus.

5.7 Hyperlipidemia

Increased serum cholesterol and triglycerides requiring treatment occurred more frequently in patients treated with sirolimus compared with azathioprine or placebo controls in Studies 1 and 2 [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. There were increased incidences of hypercholesterolemia (43 to 46%) and/or hypertriglyceridemia (45 to 57%) in patients receiving sirolimus compared with placebo controls (each 23%). The risk/benefit should be carefully considered in patients with established hyperlipidemia before initiating an immunosuppressive regimen including sirolimus.

Any patient who is administered sirolimus should be monitored for hyperlipidemia. If detected, interventions such as diet, exercise, and lipid-lowering agents should be initiated as outlined by the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.

In clinical trials of patients receiving sirolimus plus cyclosporine or sirolimus after cyclosporine withdrawal, up to 90% of patients required treatment for hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia with anti-lipid therapy (e.g., statins, fibrates). Despite anti-lipid management, up to 50% of patients had fasting serum cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL and triglycerides above recommended target levels. The concomitant administration of sirolimus and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors resulted in adverse reactions such as CPK elevations (3%), myalgia (6.7%) and rhabdomyolysis (<1%). In these trials, the number of patients was too small and duration of follow-up too short to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular mortality.

During sirolimus therapy with or without cyclosporine, patients should be monitored for elevated lipids, and patients administered an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and/or fibrate should be monitored for the possible development of rhabdomyolysis and other adverse effects, as described in the respective labeling for these agents.

5.8 Decline in Renal Function

Renal function should be closely monitored during the co-administration of sirolimus with cyclosporine, because long-term administration of the combination has been associated with deterioration of renal function. Patients treated with cyclosporine and sirolimus were noted to have higher serum creatinine levels and lower glomerular filtration rates compared with patients treated with cyclosporine and placebo or azathioprine controls (Studies 1 and 2). The rate of decline in renal function in these studies was greater in patients receiving sirolimus and cyclosporine compared with control therapies.

Appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppressive regimen, including discontinuation of sirolimus and/or cyclosporine, should be considered in patients with elevated or increasing serum creatinine levels. In patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk, continuation of combination therapy with cyclosporine beyond 4 months following transplantation should only be considered when the benefits outweigh the risks of this combination for the individual patients. Caution should be exercised when using agents (e.g., aminoglycosides and amphotericin B) that are known to have a deleterious effect on renal function.

In patients with delayed graft function, sirolimus may delay recovery of renal function.

5.9 Proteinuria

Periodic quantitative monitoring of urinary protein excretion is recommended. In a study evaluating conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients 6 to 120 months post-transplant, increased urinary protein excretion was commonly observed from 6 through 24 months after conversion to sirolimus compared with CNI continuation [see Clinical Studies (14.4), Adverse Reactions (6.4)]. Patients with the greatest amount of urinary protein excretion prior to sirolimus conversion were those whose protein excretion increased the most after conversion. New onset nephrosis (nephrotic syndrome) was also reported as a treatment-emergent adverse reaction in 2.2% of the sirolimus conversion group patients in comparison to 0.4% in the CNI continuation group of patients. Nephrotic range proteinuria (defined as urinary protein to creatinine ratio >3.5) was also reported in 9.2% in the sirolimus conversion group of patients in comparison to 3.7% in the CNI continuation group of patients. In some patients, reduction in the degree of urinary protein excretion was observed for individual patients following discontinuation of sirolimus. The safety and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients have not been established.

5.10 Latent Viral Infections

Immunosuppressed patients are at increased risk for opportunistic infections, including activation of latent viral infections. These include BK virus-associated nephropathy, which has been observed in renal transplant patients receiving immunosuppressants, including sirolimus. This infection may be associated with serious outcomes, including deteriorating renal function and renal graft loss [see Adverse Reactions (6.7)]. Patient monitoring may help detect patients at risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy. Reduction in immunosuppression should be considered for patients who develop evidence of BK virus-associated nephropathy.

Cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), sometimes fatal have been reported in patients treated with immunosuppressants, including sirolimus. PML commonly presents with hemiparesis, apathy, confusion, cognitive deficiencies and ataxia. Risk factors for PML include treatment with immunosuppressant therapies and impairment of immune function. In immunosuppressed patients, physicians should consider PML in the differential diagnosis in patients reporting neurological symptoms and consultation with a neurologist should be considered as clinically indicated. Consideration should be given to reducing the amount of immunosuppression in patients who develop PML. In transplant patients, physicians should also consider the risk that reduced immunosuppression represents to the graft.

5.11 Interstitial Lung Disease/Non-Infectious Pneumonitis

Cases of interstitial lung disease [ILD] (including pneumonitis, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia [BOOP], and pulmonary fibrosis), some fatal, with no identified infectious etiology have occurred in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens including sirolimus. In some cases, the ILD was reported with pulmonary hypertension (including pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH]) as a secondary event. In some cases, the ILD has resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus. The risk may be increased as the trough sirolimus concentration increases [see Adverse Reactions (6.7)].

5.12 De Novo Use Without Cyclosporine

The safety and efficacy of de novo use of sirolimus without cyclosporine is not established in renal transplant patients. In a multicenter clinical study, de novo renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), steroids, and an IL-2 receptor antagonist had significantly higher acute rejection rates and numerically higher death rates compared to patients treated with cyclosporine, MMF, steroids, and IL-2 receptor antagonist. A benefit, in terms of better renal function, was not apparent in the treatment arm with de novo use of sirolimus without cyclosporine. These findings were also observed in a similar treatment group of another clinical trial.

5.13 Increased Risk of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura/Thrombotic Microangiopathy

The concomitant use of sirolimus with a calcineurin inhibitor may increase the risk of calcineurin inhibitor-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/thrombotic microangiopathy (HUS/TTP/TMA) [see Adverse Reactions (6.7)].

5.14 Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia have been reported in transplant patients not receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis. Therefore, antimicrobial prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia should be administered for 1 year following transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is recommended for 3 months after transplantation, particularly for patients at increased risk for CMV disease.

5.15 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on animal studies and the mechanism of action [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)], sirolimus may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. In animal studies, mTOR inhibitors caused embryo-fetal toxicity when administered during the period of organogenesis at maternal exposures that were equal to or less than human exposures at the recommended lowest starting dose. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise women of childbearing potential to avoid becoming pregnant and to use effective contraception while using sirolimus and for 12 weeks after ending treatment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].

5.16 Different Sirolimus Trough Concentration Reported between Chromatographic and Immunoassay Methodologies

Currently in clinical practice, sirolimus whole blood concentrations are being measured by various chromatographic and immunoassay methodologies. Patient sample concentration values from different assays may not be interchangeable [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

5.17 Skin Cancer Events

Patients on immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk for skin cancer. Exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) light should be limited by wearing protective clothing and using a sunscreen with a high protection factor [see Adverse Reactions (6.1, 6.2, 6.7)] .

5.18 Interaction with Strong Inhibitors and Inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp

Avoid concomitant use of sirolimus with strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or strong inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as rifampin or rifabutin) [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

Packaging Information ⮝

American Health Packaging unit dose blisters (see How Supplied section) contain drug product from Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited as follows:
(1 mg / 30 UD) NDC 68084-915-25 packaged from NDC 55111-65

Distributed by:
American Health Packaging
Columbus, OH 43217

8291521/0918

Package/label Display Panel Carton 1 Mg ⮝

NDC 68084- 915-25

Sirolimus
Tablets
For Oral Use Only

1 mg

30 Tablets (5 x 6) Rx Only

PHARMACIST: Dispense with the accompanying
Medication Guide to each patient.

Usual Dosage: See package insert for full prescribing
information.

Store at 20 to 25 C (68 to 77 F); excursions permitted
between 15 to 30 C (59 to 86 F) [see USP Controlled
Room Temperature].

Keep this and all drugs out of reach of children.

FOR YOUR PROTECTION: Do not use if blister is torn or
broken.

The drug product contained in this package is from
NDC #55111-653, Dr. Reddy s Laboratories Limited.

Packaged and Distributed by:
American Health Packaging
Columbus, Ohio 43217

091525
0291525/0918

Package/label Display Panel Blister 1 Mg ⮝

Sirolimus
Tablet

1 mg

SIROLIMUS sirolimus tablet

Product Information Product Type HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG Item Code (Source) NDC:68084-915(NDC:55111-653) Route of Administration ORAL

Active Ingredient/Active Moiety Ingredient Name Basis of Strength Strength SIROLIMUS (UNII: W36ZG6FT64) (SIROLIMUS - UNII:W36ZG6FT64) SIROLIMUS 1 mg

Inactive Ingredients Ingredient Name Strength CARNAUBA WAX (UNII: R12CBM0EIZ) ETHYLCELLULOSE, UNSPECIFIED (UNII: 7Z8S9VYZ4B) HYPROMELLOSE 2910 (5 MPA.S) (UNII: R75537T0T4) LACTOSE MONOHYDRATE (UNII: EWQ57Q8I5X) MAGNESIUM STEARATE (UNII: 70097M6I30) MANNITOL (UNII: 3OWL53L36A) MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE (UNII: OP1R32D61U) POLOXAMER 188 (UNII: LQA7B6G8JG) POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 20000 (UNII: 5WKN5KL2O8) POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 8000 (UNII: Q662QK8M3B) SUCROSE (UNII: C151H8M554) TITANIUM DIOXIDE (UNII: 15FIX9V2JP) .ALPHA.-TOCOPHEROL (UNII: H4N855PNZ1) DIACETYLATED MONOGLYCERIDES (UNII: 5Z17386USF) POVIDONE, UNSPECIFIED (UNII: FZ989GH94E) SHELLAC (UNII: 46N107B71O) AMMONIA (UNII: 5138Q19F1X) FD&C RED NO. 40 (UNII: WZB9127XOA) PROPYLENE GLYCOL (UNII: 6DC9Q167V3)

Product Characteristics Color white Score no score Shape TRIANGLE Size 5mm Flavor Imprint Code RD;53 Contains

Packaging # Item Code Package Description Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date 1 NDC:68084-915-25 30 in 1 BOX, UNIT-DOSE 11/05/2015 1 NDC:68084-915-95 1 in 1 BLISTER PACK; Type 0: Not a Combination Product

Marketing Information Marketing Category Application Number or Monograph Citation Marketing Start Date Marketing End Date ANDA ANDA201578 11/05/2015

Labeler - American Health Packaging (929561009)

Establishment
Name	Address	ID/FEI	Business Operations
American Health Packaging		929561009	repack(68084-915)

Revised: 10/2019 Document Id: 959582fb-40fe-7e9f-e053-2995a90a7616 34391-3 Set id: 5df60452-2b16-4ce9-8c29-48798a59d718 Version: 4 Effective Time: 20191023 American Health Packaging

Highlights Of Prescribing Information ⮝

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use SIROLIMUS TABLETS safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for SIROLIMUS TABLETS.
SIROLIMUS tablets, for oral use
Initial U.S. Approval: 1999

Warning: Immunosuppression, Use Is Not Recommended In Liver Or Lung Transplant Patients  ⮝

• Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies may result from immunosuppression

Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma may result from immunosuppression. Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants. Patients receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible for maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ]

• The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.3)].
• Liver Transplantation Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis (HAT)

The use of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus was associated with excess mortality and graft loss in a study in de novo liver transplant patients. Many of these patients had evidence of infection at or near the time of death.

In this and another study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus was associated with an increase in HAT; most cases of HAT occurred within 30 days post- transplantation and most led to graft loss or death [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

• Lung Transplantation Bronchial Anastomotic Dehiscence

Cases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in de novo lung transplant patients when sirolimus has been used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].

See Full Prescribing Information For Complete Boxed Warning.  ⮝

• Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies may result from immunosuppression (5.1). Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of renal transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants.
• The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver or lung transplant patients, and therefore, such use is not recommended(5.2, 5.3).

- Liver Transplantation Excess mortality, graft loss, and hepatic artery thrombosis (5.2).

- Lung Transplantation Bronchial anastomotic dehiscence (5.3).

Recent Major Changes ⮝

Warnings and Precautions, Embryo-Fetal Toxicity ( 5.15)

01/2018

Indications And Usage ⮝

Sirolimus is an mTOR inhibitor immunosuppressant indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years receiving renal transplants.

• Patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk: Use initially with cyclosporine (CsA) and corticosteroids. CsA withdrawal is recommended 2 to 4 months after transplantation ( 1.1).
• Patients at high-immunologic risk: Use in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the first 12 months following transplantation ( 1.1). Safety and efficacy of CsA withdrawal has not been established in high risk patients ( 1.1, 1.2, 14.3).

Dosage And Administration ⮝

Renal Transplant Patients:

• Administer once daily by mouth, consistently with or without food ( 2).
• Administer the initial dose as soon as possible after transplantation and 4 hours after CsA ( 2.1, 7.1).
• Adjust the sirolimus maintenance dose to achieve sirolimus trough concentrations within the target-range ( 2.5).
• Hepatic impairment: Reduce maintenance dose in patients with hepatic impairment ( 2.7, 8.6, 12.3).

In renal transplant patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk:

• Sirolimus and CsA Combination Therapy: One loading dose of 6 mg on day 1, followed by daily maintenance doses of 2 mg ( 2.2).
• Sirolimus Following CsA Withdrawal: 2 to 4 months post-transplantation, withdraw CsA over 4 to 8 weeks ( 2.2).

In renal transplant patients at high-immunologic risk:

• Sirolimus and CsA Combination Therapy (for the first 12 months post-transplantation): One loading dose of up to 15 mg on day 1, followed by daily maintenance doses of 5 mg ( 2.3).

Dosage Forms And Strengths ⮝

• Sirolimus Tablets: 1 mg, white; 2 mg, creamish yellow ( 3.2).

Contraindications ⮝

Hypersensitivity to sirolimus ( 4).

Warnings And Precautions ⮝

• Hypersensitivity Reactions ( 5.4)
• Angioedema ( 5.5)
• Fluid Accumulation and Impairment of Wound Healing ( 5.6)
• Hyperlipidemia ( 5.7)
• Decline in Renal Function ( 5.8)
• Proteinuria ( 5.9)
• Latent Viral Infections ( 5.10)
• Interstitial Lung Disease/Non-Infectious Pneumonitis ( 5.11)
• De Novo Use Without Cyclosporine ( 5.12)
• Increased Risk of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/ Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura/ Thrombotic Microangiopathy ( 5.13)
• Embryo-Fetal Toxicity ( 5.15, 8.1)

Adverse Reactions ⮝

Prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants: Most common adverse reactions (incidence 30%) are peripheral edema, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, creatinine increased, abdominal pain, diarrhea, headache, fever, urinary tract infection, anemia, nausea, arthralgia, pain, and thrombocytopenia ( 6).

To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., at 1-888-375-3784 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch.

Drug Interactions ⮝

• Avoid concomitant use with strong CYP3A4/P-gp inducers or strong CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors that decrease or increase sirolimus concentrations ( 7.4, 12.3).
• See full prescribing information for complete list of clinically significant drug interactions ( 12.3).

Use In Specific Populations ⮝

• Pregnancy: Based on animal data may cause fetal harm ( 5.15, 8.1).

See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and Medication Guide.

Revised: 6/2018

1 Indications And Usage ⮝

1.1 Prophylaxis of Organ Rejection in Renal Transplantation

Sirolimus tablets are indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients aged 13 years or older receiving renal transplants.

In patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk, it is recommended that sirolimus tablets be used initially in a regimen with cyclosporine and corticosteroids; cyclosporine should be withdrawn 2 to 4 months after transplantation [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

In patients at high-immunologic risk (defined as Black recipients and/or repeat renal transplant recipients who lost a previous allograft for immunologic reason and/or patients with high panel-reactive antibodies [PRA; peak PRA level >80%]), it is recommended that sirolimus tablets be used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the first year following transplantation [see Dosage and Administration (2.3), Clinical Studies (14.3)].

1.2 Limitations of Use in Renal Transplantation

Cyclosporine withdrawal has not been studied in patients with Banff Grade 3 acute rejection or vascular rejection prior to cyclosporine withdrawal, those who are dialysis-dependent, those with serum creatinine >4.5 mg/dL, Black patients, patients of multi-organ transplants, secondary transplants, or those with high levels of panel-reactive antibodies [see Clinical Studies (14.2)].

In patients at high-immunologic risk, the safety and efficacy of sirolimus tablets used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids has not been studied beyond one year; therefore after the first 12 months following transplantation, any adjustments to the immunosuppressive regimen should be considered on the basis of the clinical status of the patient [see Clinical Studies (14.3)].

In pediatric patients, the safety and efficacy of sirolimus tablets have not been established in patients <13 years old, or in pediatric (<18 years) renal transplant patients considered at high-immunologic risk [see Adverse Reactions (6.5), Clinical Studies (14.6)].

The safety and efficacy of de novo use of sirolimus tablets without cyclosporine have not been established in renal transplant patients [see Warnings and Precautions (5.12)].

The safety and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus tablets in maintenance renal transplant patients have not been established [see Clinical Studies (14.4)].

2 Dosage And Administration ⮝

Sirolimus tablets are to be administered orally once daily, consistently with or without food [see Dosage and Administration (2.5), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

Tablets should not be crushed, chewed or split. Patients unable to take the tablets should be prescribed the solution and instructed in its use.

2.1 General Dosing Guidance for Renal Transplant Patients

The initial dose of sirolimus tablets should be administered as soon as possible after transplantation. It is recommended that sirolimus tablets be taken 4 hours after administration of cyclosporine oral solution (MODIFIED) and or/cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED) [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

Frequent sirolimus tablets dose adjustments based on non-steady-state sirolimus concentrations can lead to overdosing or underdosing because sirolimus has a long half-life. Once sirolimus tablets maintenance dose is adjusted, patients should continue on the new maintenance dose for at least 7 to 14 days before further dosage adjustment with concentration monitoring. In most patients, dose adjustments can be based on simple proportion: new sirolimus tablets dose = current dose (target concentration/current concentration). A loading dose should be considered in addition to a new maintenance dose when it is necessary to increase sirolimus trough concentrations: sirolimus tablets loading dose = 3 (new maintenance dose - current maintenance dose). The maximum sirolimus tablets dose administered on any day should not exceed 40 mg. If an estimated daily dose exceeds 40 mg due to the addition of a loading dose, the loading dose should be administered over 2 days. Sirolimus trough concentrations should be monitored at least 3 to 4 days after a loading dose(s).

Two milligrams (2 mg) of sirolimus oral solution have been demonstrated to be clinically equivalent to 2 mg sirolimus tablets; hence, at this dose these two formulations are interchangeable. However, it is not known if higher doses of sirolimus oral solution are clinically equivalent to higher doses of sirolimus tablets on a mg-to-mg basis [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

2.2 Renal Transplant Patients at Low- to Moderate-Immunologic Risk

Sirolimus Tablets and Cyclosporine Combination Therapy
For de novo renal transplant patients, it is recommended that sirolimus oral solution and tablets be used initially in a regimen with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. A loading dose of sirolimus tablets equivalent to 3 times the maintenance dose should be given, i.e. a daily maintenance dose of 2 mg should be preceded with a loading dose of 6 mg. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be used to maintain sirolimus drug concentrations within the target-range [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Sirolimus Tablets Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal
At 2 to 4 months following transplantation, cyclosporine should be progressively discontinued over 4 to 8 weeks, and the sirolimus tablets dose should be adjusted to obtain sirolimus whole blood trough concentrations within the target-range [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)]. Because cyclosporine inhibits the metabolism and transport of sirolimus, sirolimus concentrations may decrease when cyclosporine is discontinued, unless the sirolimus tablets dose is increased [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

2.3 Renal Transplant Patients at High-Immunologic Risk

In patients with high-immunologic risk, it is recommended that sirolimus tablets be used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the first 12 months following transplantation [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. The safety and efficacy of this combination in high-immunologic risk patients has not been studied beyond the first 12 months. Therefore, after the first 12 months following transplantation, any adjustments to the immunosuppressive regimen should be considered on the basis of the clinical status of the patient.

For patients receiving sirolimus tablets with cyclosporine, sirolimus tablets therapy should be initiated with a loading dose of up to 15 mg on day 1 post-transplantation. Beginning on day 2, an initial maintenance dose of 5 mg/day should be given. A trough level should be obtained between days 5 and 7, and the daily dose of sirolimus tablets should thereafter be adjusted [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

The starting dose of cyclosporine should be up to 7 mg/kg/day in divided doses and the dose should subsequently be adjusted to achieve target whole blood trough concentrations [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)]. Prednisone should be administered at a minimum of 5 mg/day.

Antibody induction therapy may be used.

2.5 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Monitoring of sirolimus trough concentrations is recommended for all patients, especially in those patients likely to have altered drug metabolism, in patients 13 years who weigh less than 40 kg, in patients with hepatic impairment, when a change in the sirolimus tablets dosage form is made, and during concurrent administration of strong CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors [see Drug Interactions (7)].

Therapeutic drug monitoring should not be the sole basis for adjusting sirolimus tablets therapy. Careful attention should be made to clinical signs/symptoms, tissue biopsy findings, and laboratory parameters.

When used in combination with cyclosporine, sirolimus trough concentrations should be maintained within the target-range [see Clinical Studies (14), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Following cyclosporine withdrawal in transplant patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk, the target sirolimus trough concentrations should be 16 to 24 ng/mL for the first year following transplantation. Thereafter, the target sirolimus concentrations should be 12 to 20 ng/mL.

The above recommended 24-hour trough concentration ranges for sirolimus are based on chromatographic methods. Currently in clinical practice, sirolimus whole blood concentrations are being measured by both chromatographic and immunoassay methodologies. Because the measured sirolimus whole blood concentrations depend on the type of assay used, the concentrations obtained by these different methodologies are not interchangeable [see Warnings and Precautions (5.16), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Adjustments to the targeted range should be made according to the assay utilized to determine sirolimus trough concentrations. Since results are assay and laboratory dependent, and the results may change over time, adjustments to the targeted therapeutic range must be made with a detailed knowledge of the site-specific assay used. Therefore, communication should be maintained with the laboratory performing the assay. A discussion of different assay methods is contained in Clinical Therapeutics, Volume 22, Supplement B, April 2000 [see References (15)].

2.6 Patients with Low Body Weight

The initial dosage in patients 13 years who weigh less than 40 kg should be adjusted, based on body surface area, to 1 mg/m/day. The loading dose should be 3 mg/m 2.

2.7 Patients with Hepatic Impairment

It is recommended that the maintenance dose of sirolimus tablets be reduced by approximately one third in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and by approximately one half in patients with severe hepatic impairment. It is not necessary to modify the sirolimus tablets loading dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

2.8 Patients with Renal Impairment

Dosage adjustment is not needed in patients with impaired renal function [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7)].

3 Dosage Forms And Strengths ⮝

3.2 Sirolimus Tablets

• Sirolimus tablets 1 mg are white, triangular shaped tablets imprinted with RD over "53" in red color on one side and plain on the other side.
• Sirolimus tablets 2 mg are creamish yellow, triangular shaped tablets imprinted with RD over "54" in red color on one side and plain on the other side.

4 Contraindications ⮝

Sirolimus is contraindicated in patients with a hypersensitivity to sirolimus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].

5 Warnings And Precautions  ⮝

5.1 Increased Susceptibility to Infection and the Possible Development of Lymphoma

Increased susceptibility to infection and the possible development of lymphoma and other malignancies, particularly of the skin, may result from immunosuppression. The rates of lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disease observed in Studies 1 and 2 were 0.7 to 3.2% (for sirolimus-treated patients) versus 0.6 to 0.8% (azathioprine and placebo control) [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) and (6.2)]. Oversuppression of the immune system can also increase susceptibility to infection, including opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis, fatal infections, and sepsis. Only physicians experienced in immunosuppressive therapy and management of organ transplant patients should use sirolimus for prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants. Patients receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible for maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient.

5.2 Liver Transplantation - Excess Mortality, Graft Loss, and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in liver transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended. The use of sirolimus has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients following liver transplantation, including excess mortality, graft loss and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT).

In a study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus was associated with excess mortality and graft loss (22% in combination versus 9% on tacrolimus alone). Many of these patients had evidence of infection at or near the time of death.

In this and another study in de novo liver transplant patients, the use of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus was associated with an increase in HAT (7% in combination versus 2% in the control arm); most cases of HAT occurred within 30 days post- transplantation, and most led to graft loss or death.

In a clinical study in stable liver transplant patients 6 to 144 months post-liver transplantation and receiving a CNI-based regimen, an increased number of deaths was observed in the group converted to a sirolimus-based regimen compared to the group who was continued on a CNI- based regimen, although the difference was not statistically significant (3.8% versus 1.4%) [see Clinical Studies (14.5)].

5.3 Lung Transplantation-Bronchial Anastomotic Dehiscence

Cases of bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, most fatal, have been reported in de novo lung transplant patients when sirolimus has been used as part of an immunosuppressive regimen.

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as immunosuppressive therapy have not been established in lung transplant patients; therefore, such use is not recommended.

5.4 Hypersensitivity Reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema, exfoliative dermatitis and hypersensitivity vasculitis, have been associated with the administration of sirolimus [see Adverse Reactions (6.7) ].

5.5 Angioedema

Sirolimus has been associated with the development of angioedema. The concomitant use of sirolimus with other drugs known to cause angioedema, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, may increase the risk of developing angioedema. Elevated sirolimus levels (with/without concomitant ACE inhibitors) may also potentiate angioedema [see Drug Interactions (7.2)]. In some cases, the angioedema has resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus.

5.6 Fluid Accumulation and Impairmentof Wound Healing

There have been reports of impaired or delayed wound healing in patients receiving sirolimus, including lymphocele and wound dehiscence [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors such as sirolimus have been shown in vitro to inhibit production of certain growth factors that may affect angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and vascular permeability. Lymphocele, a known surgical complication of renal transplantation, occurred significantly more often in a dose-related fashion in patients treated with sirolimus [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Appropriate measures should be considered to minimize such complications. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 may be at increased risk of abnormal wound healing based on data from the medical literature.

There have also been reports of fluid accumulation, including peripheral edema, lymphedema, pleural effusion, ascites, and pericardial effusions (including hemodynamically significant effusions and tamponade requiring intervention in children and adults), in patients receiving sirolimus.

5.7 Hyperlipidemia

Increased serum cholesterol and triglycerides requiring treatment occurred more frequently in patients treated with sirolimus compared with azathioprine or placebo controls in Studies 1 and 2 [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. There were increased incidences of hypercholesterolemia (43 to 46%) and/or hypertriglyceridemia (45 to 57%) in patients receiving sirolimus compared with placebo controls (each 23%). The risk/benefit should be carefully considered in patients with established hyperlipidemia before initiating an immunosuppressive regimen including sirolimus.

Any patient who is administered sirolimus should be monitored for hyperlipidemia. If detected, interventions such as diet, exercise, and lipid-lowering agents should be initiated as outlined by the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.

In clinical trials of patients receiving sirolimus plus cyclosporine or sirolimus after cyclosporine withdrawal, up to 90% of patients required treatment for hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia with anti-lipid therapy (e.g., statins, fibrates). Despite anti-lipid management, up to 50% of patients had fasting serum cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL and triglycerides above recommended target levels. The concomitant administration of sirolimus and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors resulted in adverse reactions such as CPK elevations (3%), myalgia (6.7%) and rhabdomyolysis (<1%). In these trials, the number of patients was too small and duration of follow-up too short to evaluate the long-term impact of sirolimus on cardiovascular mortality.

During sirolimus therapy with or without cyclosporine, patients should be monitored for elevated lipids, and patients administered an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and/or fibrate should be monitored for the possible development of rhabdomyolysis and other adverse effects, as described in the respective labeling for these agents.

5.8 Decline in Renal Function

Renal function should be closely monitored during the co-administration of sirolimus with cyclosporine, because long-term administration of the combination has been associated with deterioration of renal function. Patients treated with cyclosporine and sirolimus were noted to have higher serum creatinine levels and lower glomerular filtration rates compared with patients treated with cyclosporine and placebo or azathioprine controls (Studies 1 and 2). The rate of decline in renal function in these studies was greater in patients receiving sirolimus and cyclosporine compared with control therapies.

Appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppressive regimen, including discontinuation of sirolimus and/or cyclosporine, should be considered in patients with elevated or increasing serum creatinine levels. In patients at low- to moderate-immunologic risk, continuation of combination therapy with cyclosporine beyond 4 months following transplantation should only be considered when the benefits outweigh the risks of this combination for the individual patients. Caution should be exercised when using agents (e.g., aminoglycosides and amphotericin B) that are known to have a deleterious effect on renal function.

In patients with delayed graft function, sirolimus may delay recovery of renal function.

5.9 Proteinuria

Periodic quantitative monitoring of urinary protein excretion is recommended. In a study evaluating conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients 6 to 120 months post-transplant, increased urinary protein excretion was commonly observed from 6 through 24 months after conversion to sirolimus compared with CNI continuation [see Clinical Studies (14.4), Adverse Reactions (6.4)]. Patients with the greatest amount of urinary protein excretion prior to sirolimus conversion were those whose protein excretion increased the most after conversion. New onset nephrosis (nephrotic syndrome) was also reported as a treatment-emergent adverse reaction in 2.2% of the sirolimus conversion group patients in comparison to 0.4% in the CNI continuation group of patients. Nephrotic range proteinuria (defined as urinary protein to creatinine ratio > 3.5) was also reported in 9.2% in the sirolimus conversion group of patients in comparison to 3.7% in the CNI continuation group of patients. In some patients, reduction in the degree of urinary protein excretion was observed for individual patients following discontinuation of sirolimus. The safety and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients have not been established.

5.10 Latent Viral Infections

Immunosuppressed patients are at increased risk for opportunistic infections, including activation of latent viral infections. These include BK virus-associated nephropathy, which has been observed in renal transplant patients receiving immunosuppressants, including sirolimus. This infection may be associated with serious outcomes, including deteriorating renal function and renal graft loss [see Adverse Reactions (6.7)]. Patient monitoring may help detect patients at risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy. Reduction in immunosuppression should be considered for patients who develop evidence of BK virus-associated nephropathy.

Cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), sometimes fatal have been reported in patients treated with immunosuppressants, including sirolimus. PML commonly presents with hemiparesis, apathy, confusion, cognitive deficiencies and ataxia. Risk factors for PML include treatment with immunosuppressant therapies and impairment of immune function. In immunosuppressed patients, physicians should consider PML in the differential diagnosis in patients reporting neurological symptoms and consultation with a neurologist should be considered as clinically indicated. Consideration should be given to reducing the amount of immunosuppression in patients who develop PML. In transplant patients, physicians should also consider the risk that reduced immunosuppression represents to the graft.

5.11 Interstitial Lung Disease/Non-Infectious Pneumonitis

Cases of interstitial lung disease [ILD] (including pneumonitis, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia [BOOP], and pulmonary fibrosis), some fatal, with no identified infectious etiology have occurred in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens including sirolimus. In some cases, the ILD was reported with pulmonary hypertension (including pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH]) as a secondary event. In some cases, the ILD has resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus. The risk may be increased as the trough sirolimus concentration increases [see Adverse Reactions (6.7)].

5.12 De Novo Use Without Cyclosporine

The safety and efficacy of de novo use of sirolimus without cyclosporine is not established in renal transplant patients. In a multicenter clinical study, de novo renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), steroids, and an IL-2 receptor antagonist had significantly higher acute rejection rates and numerically higher death rates compared to patients treated with cyclosporine, MMF, steroids, and IL-2 receptor antagonist. A benefit, in terms of better renal function, was not apparent in the treatment arm with de novo use of sirolimus without cyclosporine. These findings were also observed in a similar treatment group of another clinical trial.

5.13 Increased Risk of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura/Thrombotic Microangiopathy

The concomitant use of sirolimus with a calcineurin inhibitor may increase the risk of calcineurin inhibitor-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/thrombotic microangiopathy (HUS/TTP/TMA) [see Adverse Reactions (6.7) ].

5.14 Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia have been reported in transplant patients not receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis. Therefore, antimicrobial prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia should be administered for 1 year following transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is recommended for 3 months after transplantation, particularly for patients at increased risk for CMV disease.

5.15 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on animal studies and the mechanism of action [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)], sirolimus can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. In animal studies, sirolimus caused embryo-fetal toxicity when administered during the period of organogenesis at maternal exposures that were equal to or less than human exposures at the recommended lowest starting dose. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise female patients of reproductive potential to avoid becoming pregnant and to use highly effective contraception while using sirolimus and for 12 weeks after ending treatment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].

5.16 Male Infertility

Azoospermia or oligospermia may be observed [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.2 ), Nonclinical Toxicology ( 13.1 )]. Sirolimus is an anti-proliferative drug and affects rapidly dividing cells like the germ cells.

5.17 Different Sirolimus Trough Concentration Reported between Chromatographic and Immunoassay Methodologies

Currently in clinical practice, sirolimus whole blood concentrations are being measured by various chromatographic and immunoassay methodologies. Patient sample concentration values from different assays may not be interchangeable [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

5.18 Skin Cancer Events

Patients on immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk for skin cancer. Exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) light should be limited by wearing protective clothing and using a broad spectrum sunscreen with a high protection factor[see Adverse Reactions (6.1, 6.2,6.7)].

5.19 Immunizations

The use of live vaccines should be avoided during treatment with sirolimus; live vaccines may include, but are not limited to, the following: measles, mumps, rubella, oral polio, BCG, yellow fever, varicella, and TY21a typhoid. Immunosuppressants may affect response to vaccination. Therefore, during treatment with sirolimus, vaccination may be less effective.

5.20 Interaction with Strong Inhibitors and Inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp

Avoid concomitant use of sirolimus with strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or strong inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as rifampin or rifabutin) [see Drug Interactions (7.2)].

6 Adverse Reactions ⮝

The following adverse reactions are discussed in greater detail in other sections of the label.

• Increased susceptibility to infection, lymphoma, and malignancy [see Boxed Warning, Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]
• Excess mortality, graft loss, and hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant patients [see Boxed Warning, Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]
• Bronchial anastomotic dehiscence in lung transplant patients [see Boxed Warning, Warnings and Precautions (5.3)]
• Hypersensitivity reactions [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)]
• Exfoliative dermatitis [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)]
• Angioedema [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5)]
• Fluid Accumulation and Impairment of Wound Healing [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6)]
• Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7)]
• Decline in renal function in long-term combination of cyclosporine with sirolimus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)]
• Proteinuria [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9)]
• Interstitial lung disease [see Warnings and Precautions (5.11)]
• Increased risk of calcineurin inhibitor-induced HUS/TTP/TMA [see Warnings and Precautions (5.13)].

The most common ( 30%) adverse reactions observed with sirolimus in clinical studies for organ rejection prophylaxis in recipients of renal transplantation are: peripheral edema, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, creatinine increased, constipation, abdominal pain, diarrhea, headache, fever, urinary tract infection, anemia, nausea, arthralgia, pain, and thrombocytopenia.

The following adverse reactions resulted in a rate of discontinuation of >5% in clinical trials for renal transplant rejection prophylaxis: creatinine increased, hypertriglyceridemia, and TTP.

6.1 Clinical Studies Experience in Prophylaxis of Organ Rejection Following Renal Transplantation

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus oral solution for the prevention of organ rejection following renal transplantation were assessed in two randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trials [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. The safety profiles in the two studies were similar.

The incidence of adverse reactions in the randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial (Study 2) in which 219 renal transplant patients received sirolimus oral solution 2 mg/day, 208 received sirolimus oral solution 5 mg/day, and 124 received placebo is presented in Table 1 below. The study population had a mean age of 46 years (range 15 to 71 years), the distribution was 67% male, and the composition by race was: White (78%), Black (11%), Asian (3%), Hispanic (2%), and Other (5%). All patients were treated with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Data ( 12 months post-transplant) presented in the following table show the adverse reactions that occurred in at least one of the sirolimus treatment groups with an incidence of 20%.

The safety profile of the tablet did not differ from that of the oral solution formulation [see Clinical Studies (14.1)].

In general, adverse reactions related to the administration of sirolimus were dependent on dose/concentration. Although a daily maintenance dose of 5 mg, with a loading dose of 15 mg, was shown to be safe and effective, no efficacy advantage over the 2 mg dose could be established for renal transplant patients. Patients receiving 2 mg of sirolimus oral solution per day demonstrated an overall better safety profile than did patients receiving 5 mg of sirolimus oral solution per day.

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in one clinical trial of a drug cannot be directly compared with rates in the clinical trials of the same or another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

TABLE 1: ADVERSE REACTIONS OCCURRING AT A FREQUENCY OF 20% IN AT LEAST ONE OF THE SIROLIMUS TREATMENT GROUPS IN A STUDY OF PROPHYLAXIS OF ORGAN REJECTION FOLLOWING RENAL TRANSPLANTATION (%) AT 12 MONTHS POST-TRANSPLANTATION (STUDY 2) *

	Sirolimus Oral Solution
	2 mg/day	5 mg/day	Placebo
Adverse Reaction	(n = 218)	(n = 208)	(n = 124)
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids.
Peripheral edema	54	58	48
Hypertriglyceridemia	45	57	23
Hypertension	45	49	48
Hypercholesterolemia	43	46	23
Creatinine increased	39	40	38
Constipation	36	38	31
Abdominal pain	29	36	30
Diarrhea	25	35	27
Headache	34	34	31
Fever	23	34	35
Urinary tract infection	26	33	26
Anemia	23	33	21
Nausea	25	31	29
Arthralgia	25	31	18
Thrombocytopenia	14	30	9
Pain	33	29	25
Acne	22	22	19
Rash	10	20	6
Edema	20	18	15

The following adverse reactions were reported less frequently ( 3%, but <20%)

• Body as a Whole Sepsis, lymphocele, herpes zoster, herpes simplex.
• Cardiovascular Venous thromboembolism (including pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis), tachycardia.
• Digestive System Stomatitis.
• Hematologic and Lymphatic System Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS), leukopenia.
• Metabolic/Nutritional Abnormal healing, increased lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), hypokalemia, diabetes mellitus.
• Musculoskeletal System Bone necrosis.
• Respiratory System Pneumonia, epistaxis.
• Skin Melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma.
• Urogenital System Pyelonephritis, decline in renal function (creatinine increased) in long-term combination of cyclosporine with sirolimus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)], ovarian cysts, menstrual disorders (including amenorrhea and menorrhagia).

Less frequently (<3%) occurring adverse reactions included: lymphoma/post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, mycobacterial infections (including M. tuberculosis), pancreatitis, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus.

Increased Serum Cholesterol and Triglycerides
The use of sirolimus in renal transplant patients was associated with increased serum cholesterol and triglycerides that may require treatment.

In Studies 1 and 2, in de novo renal transplant patients who began the study with fasting, total serum cholesterol <200 mg/dL or fasting, total serum triglycerides <200 mg/dL, there was an increased incidence of hypercholesterolemia (fasting serum cholesterol >240 mg/dL) or hypertriglyceridemia (fasting serum triglycerides >500 mg/dL), respectively, in patients receiving both sirolimus 2 mg and sirolimus 5 mg compared with azathioprine and placebo controls.

Treatment of new-onset hypercholesterolemia with lipid-lowering agents was required in 42 to 52% of patients enrolled in the sirolimus arms of Studies 1 and 2 compared with 16% of patients in the placebo arm and 22% of patients in the azathioprine arm. In other sirolimus renal transplant studies, up to 90% of patients required treatment for hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia with anti-lipid therapy (e.g., statins, fibrates). Despite anti-lipid management, up to 50% of patients had fasting serum cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL and triglycerides above recommended target levels [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7)].

Abnormal Healing
Abnormal healing events following transplant surgery include fascial dehiscence, incisional hernia, and anastomosis disruption (e.g., wound, vascular, airway, ureteral, biliary).

Malignancies
Table 2 below summarizes the incidence of malignancies in the two controlled trials (Studies 1 and 2) for the prevention of acute rejection [see Clinical Studies (14.1)].

At 24 months (Study 1) and 36 months (Study 2) post-transplant, there were no significant differences among treatment groups.

TABLE 2: INCIDENCE (%) OF MALIGNANCIES IN STUDY 1 (24 MONTHS) AND STUDY 2 (36 MONTHS) POST-TRANSPLANT *

Malignancy	Sirolimus Oral Solution 2 mg/day		Sirolimus Oral Solution 5 mg/day		Azathioprine 2 to 3 mg/kg/day	Placebo
	Study 1 (n = 284)	Study 2 (n = 227)	Study 1 (n = 274)	Study 2 (n = 219)	Study 1 (n = 161)	Study 2 (n = 130)
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Patients may be counted in more than one category.
Lymphoma/ lymphoproliferative disease	0.7	1.8	1.1	3.2	0.6	0.8
Skin Carcinoma
Any Squamous Cell	0.4	2.7	2.2	0.9	3.8	3
Any Basal Cell	0.7	2.2	1.5	1.8	2.5	5.3
Melanoma	0	0.4	0	1.4	0	0
Miscellaneous/Not Specified	0	0	0	0	0	0.8
Total	1.1	4.4	3.3	4.1	4.3	7.7
Other Malignancy	1.1	2.2	1.5	1.4	0.6	2.3

6.2 Sirolimus Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal

The incidence of adverse reactions was determined through 36 months in a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial (Study 3) in which 215 renal transplant patients received sirolimus as a maintenance regimen following cyclosporine withdrawal, and 215 patients received sirolimus with cyclosporine therapy [see Clinical Studies (14.2)]. All patients were treated with corticosteroids. The safety profile prior to randomization (start of cyclosporine withdrawal) was similar to that of the 2 mg sirolimus groups in Studies 1 and 2.

Following randomization (at 3 months), patients who had cyclosporine eliminated from their therapy experienced higher incidences of the following adverse reactions: abnormal liver function tests (including increased AST/SGOT and increased ALT/SGPT), hypokalemia, thrombocytopenia, and abnormal healing. Conversely, the incidence of the following adverse events was higher in patients who remained on cyclosporine than those who had cyclosporine withdrawn from therapy: hypertension, cyclosporine toxicity, increased creatinine, abnormal kidney function, toxic nephropathy, edema, hyperkalemia, hyperuricemia, and gum hyperplasia. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure improved significantly following cyclosporine withdrawal.

Malignancies
The incidence of malignancies in Study 3 [see Clinical Studies (14.2)] is presented in Table 3.

In Study 3, the incidence of lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disease was similar in all treatment groups. The overall incidence of malignancy was higher in patients receiving sirolimus plus cyclosporine compared with patients who had cyclosporine withdrawn. Conclusions regarding these differences in the incidence of malignancy could not be made because Study 3 was not designed to consider malignancy risk factors or systematically screen subjects for malignancy. In addition, more patients in the sirolimus with cyclosporine group had a pretransplantation history of skin carcinoma.

TABLE 3: INCIDENCE (%) OF MALIGNANCIES IN STUDY 3 (CYCLOSPORINE WITHDRAWAL STUDY) AT 36 MONTHS POST-TRANSPLANT *,

Malignancy	Nonrandomized (n = 95)	Sirolimus with Cyclosporine Therapy (n = 215)	Sirolimus Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal (n = 215)
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Patients may be counted in more than one category.
Lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disease	1.1	1.4	0.5
Skin Carcinoma
Any Squamous Cell	3.2	3.3	2.3
Any Basal Cell	3.2	6.5	2.3
Melanoma	0	0.5	0
Miscellaneous/Not Specified	1.1	0.9	0
Total	4.2	7.9	3.7
Other Malignancy	3.2	3.3	1.9

6.3 High-Immunologic Risk Renal Transplant Patients

Safety was assessed in 224 patients who received at least one dose of sirolimus with cyclosporine [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. Overall, the incidence and nature of adverse reactions was similar to those seen in previous combination studies with sirolimus. The incidence of malignancy was 1.3% at 12 months.

6.4 Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus in Maintenance Renal Transplant Population

The safety and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in maintenance renal transplant population have not been established [see Clinical Studies (14.4)]. In a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus (initial target sirolimus concentrations of 12 to 20 ng/mL, and then 8 to 20 ng/mL, by chromatographic assay) in maintenance renal transplant patients, enrollment was stopped in the subset of patients (n = 87) with a baseline glomerular filtration rate of less than 40 mL/min. There was a higher rate of serious adverse events, including pneumonia, acute rejection, graft loss and death, in this stratum of the sirolimus treatment arm.

The subset of patients with a baseline glomerular filtration rate of less than 40 mL/min had 2 years of follow-up after randomization. In this population, the rate of pneumonia was 25.9% (15/58) versus 13.8% (4/29), graft loss (excluding death with functioning graft loss) was 22.4% (13/58) versus 31% (9/29), and death was 15.5% (9/58) versus 3.4% (1/29) in the sirolimus conversion group and CNI continuation group, respectively.

In the subset of patients with a baseline glomerular filtration rate of greater than 40 mL/min, there was no benefit associated with conversion with regard to improvement in renal function and a greater incidence of proteinuria in the sirolimus conversion arm.

Overall in this study, a 5-fold increase in the reports of tuberculosis among sirolimus 2% (11/551) and comparator 0.4% (1/273) treatment groups was observed with 2:1 randomization scheme.

In a second study evaluating the safety and efficacy of conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus 3 to 5 months post-kidney transplant, a higher rate of adverse events, discontinuations due to adverse events, acute rejection, and new onset diabetes mellitus was observed following conversion to sirolimus. There was also no benefit with respect to renal function and a greater incidence of proteinuria was observed after conversion to sirolimus [see Clinical Studies (14.4)].

6.5 Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients

Safety was assessed in a controlled clinical trial in pediatric (<18 years of age) renal transplant patients considered at high-immunologic risk, defined as a history of one or more acute allograft rejection episodes and/or the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy on a renal biopsy [see Clinical Studies (14.6)]. The use of sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids was associated with a higher incidence of deterioration of renal function (creatinine increased) compared to calcineurin inhibitor-based therapy, serum lipid abnormalities (including, but not limited to, increased serum triglycerides and cholesterol), and urinary tract infections.

6.7 Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of sirolimus in transplant patients. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.

• Body as a Whole Lymphedema.
• Cardiovascular Pericardial effusion (including hemodynamically significant effusions and tamponade requiring intervention in children and adults) and fluid accumulation.
• Digestive System Ascites.
• Hematological/Lymphatic Pancytopenia, neutropenia.
• Hepatobiliary Disorders Hepatotoxicity, including fatal hepatic necrosis, with elevated sirolimus trough concentrations.
• Immune System Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema, and hypersensitivity vasculitis [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].
• Infections Tuberculosis. BK virus associated nephropathy has been observed in patients receiving immunosuppressants, including sirolimus. This infection may be associated with serious outcomes, including deteriorating renal function and renal graft loss. Cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), sometimes fatal, have been reported in patients treated with immunosuppressants, including sirolimus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.10)]. Clostridium difficile enterocolitis.
• Metabolic/Nutritional Liver function test abnormal, AST/SGOT increased, ALT/SGPT increased, hypophosphatemia, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus.
• Nervous System Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.
• Respiratory Cases of interstitial lung disease (including pneumonitis, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia [BOOP], and pulmonary fibrosis), some fatal, with no identified infectious etiology have occurred in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens including sirolimus. In some cases, the interstitial lung disease has resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus. The risk may be increased as the sirolimus trough concentration increases [see Warnings and Precautions (5.11)]; pulmonary hemorrhage; pleural effusion; alveolar proteinosis.
• Skin Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin (Merkel cell carcinoma) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.17)], exfoliative dermatitis [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].
• Urogenital Nephrotic syndrome, proteinuria, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, ovarian cysts, menstrual disorders (including amenorrhea and menorrhagia). Azoospermia has been reported with the use of sirolimus and has been reversible upon discontinuation of sirolimus in most cases.

7 Drug Interactions ⮝

Sirolimus is known to be a substrate for both cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and p-glycoprotein (P-gp). Inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp may decrease sirolimus concentrations whereas inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp may increase sirolimus concentrations.

7.1 Use with Cyclosporine

Cyclosporine, a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp, was demonstrated to increase sirolimus concentrations when co-administered with sirolimus. In order to diminish the effect of this interaction with cyclosporine, it is recommended that sirolimus be taken 4 hours after administration of cyclosporine oral solution (MODIFIED) and/or cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED). If cyclosporine is withdrawn from combination therapy with sirolimus, higher doses of sirolimus are needed to maintain the recommended sirolimus trough concentration ranges [see Dosage and Administration (2.2), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

7.2 Strong Inducers and Strong Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp

Avoid concomitant use of sirolimus with strong inducers (e.g., rifampin, rifabutin) and strong inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, telithromycin, clarithromycin) of CYP3A4 and P-gp. Alternative agents with lesser interaction potential with sirolimus should be considered [see Warnings and Precautions (5.18), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

7.3 Grapefruit Juice

Because grapefruit juice inhibits the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of sirolimus, it must not be taken with sirolimus [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

7.4 Weak and Moderate Inducers or Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp

Exercise caution when using sirolimus with drugs or agents that are modulators of CYP3A4 and P-gp. The dosage of sirolimus and/or the co-administered drug may need to be adjusted [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

• Drugs that could increase sirolimus blood concentrations:
  Bromocriptine, cimetidine, cisapride, clotrimazole, danazol, diltiazem, fluconazole, protease inhibitors (e.g., HIV and hepatitis C that include drugs such as ritonavir, indinavir, boceprevir, and telaprevir), metoclopramide, nicardipine, troleandomycin, verapamil
• Drugs and other agents that could decrease sirolimus concentrations:
  Carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifapentine, St. John s Wort ( Hypericum perforatum)
• Drugs with concentrations that could increase when given with sirolimus:
  Verapamil

7.5 Vaccination

Immunosuppressants may affect response to vaccination. Therefore, during treatment with sirolimus, vaccination may be less effective. The use of live vaccines should be avoided; live vaccines may include, but are not limited to, the following: measles, mumps, rubella, oral polio, BCG, yellow fever, varicella, and TY21a typhoid.

8 Use In Specific Populations ⮝

8.1 Pregnancy

Pregnancy Category C: Sirolimus was embryo/fetotoxic in rats when given in doses approximately 0.2 to 0.5 the human doses (adjusted for body surface area). Embryo/fetotoxicity was manifested as mortality and reduced fetal weights (with associated delays in skeletal ossification). However, no teratogenesis was evident. In combination with cyclosporine, rats had increased embryo/feto mortality compared with sirolimus alone. There were no effects on rabbit development at a maternally toxic dosage approximately 0.3 to 0.8 times the human doses (adjusted for body surface area). There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Effective contraception must be initiated before sirolimus therapy, during sirolimus therapy, and for 12 weeks after sirolimus therapy has been stopped.

8.3 Nursing Mothers

Sirolimus is excreted in trace amounts in milk of lactating rats. It is not known whether sirolimus is excreted in human milk. The pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of sirolimus in infants are not known. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, and because of the potential for adverse reactions in nursing infants from sirolimus, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.

8.4 Pediatric Use

Renal Transplant
The safety and efficacy of sirolimus in pediatric patients <13 years have not been established.

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus oral solution and sirolimus tablets have been established for prophylaxis of organ rejection in renal transplantation in children 13 years judged to be at low- to moderate-immunologic risk. Use of sirolimus oral solution and sirolimus tablets in this subpopulation of children 13 years is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled trials of sirolimus oral solution in adults with additional pharmacokinetic data in pediatric renal transplantation patients [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

Safety and efficacy information from a controlled clinical trial in pediatric and adolescent (<18 years of age) renal transplant patients judged to be at high-immunologic risk, defined as a history of one or more acute rejection episodes and/or the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy, do not support the chronic use of sirolimus oral solution or tablets in combination with calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids, due to the higher incidence of lipid abnormalities and deterioration of renal function associated with these immunosuppressive regimens compared to calcineurin inhibitors, without increased benefit with respect to acute rejection, graft survival, or patient survival [see Clinical Studies (14.6)].

8.5 Geriatric Use

Clinical studies of sirolimus oral solution or tablets did not include sufficient numbers of patients 65 years to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients. Data pertaining to sirolimus trough concentrations suggest that dose adjustments based upon age in geriatric renal patients are not necessary. Differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients have not been identified. In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.

8.6 Patients with Hepatic Impairment

The maintenance dose of sirolimus should be reduced in patients with hepatic impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

8.7 Patients with Renal Impairment

Dosage adjustment is not required in patients with renal impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.8), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

10 Overdosage ⮝

Reports of overdose with sirolimus have been received; however, experience has been limited. In general, the adverse effects of overdose are consistent with those listed in the adverse reactions section [see Adverse Reactions (6)].

General supportive measures should be followed in all cases of overdose. Based on the low aqueous solubility and high erythrocyte and plasma protein binding of sirolimus, it is anticipated that sirolimus is not dialyzable to any significant extent. In mice and rats, the acute oral LD 50 was greater than 800 mg/kg.

11 Description ⮝

Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive agent. Sirolimus is a macrocyclic lactone produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus. The chemical name of sirolimus (also known as rapamycin) is (3 S,6 R,7 E,9 R,10 R,12 R,14 S,15 E,17 E,19 E,21 S,23 S,26 R,27 R,34a S) 9,10,12,13,14,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,32,33,34, 34a-hexadecahydro-9,27-dihydroxy-3-[(1 R)-2 [(1 S,3 R,4 R)-4-hydroxy-3-methoxycyclohexyl]-1-methylethyl]-10,21-dimethoxy-6,8,12,14,20,26 hexamethyl-23,27-epoxy-3 H-pyrido[2,1-c][1,4] oxaazacyclohentriacontine-1,5,11,28,29 (4 H,6 H,31 H)-pentone. Its molecular formula is C 51H 79NO 13 and its molecular weight is 914.2. The structural formula of sirolimus is illustrated as follows.

Sirolimus is a white to off-white powder and is insoluble in water, but freely soluble in chloroform, acetone and acetonitrile.

Sirolimus tablets are available as a white, triangular shaped tablet containing 1 mg sirolimus, and as a creamish yellow, triangular shaped tablet containing 2 mg sirolimus.

The inactive ingredients in sirolimus tablets includes, carnauba wax, ethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 5 cps, lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate, mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose (avicel pH 105), microcrystalline cellulose (avicel pH 200), poloxamer 188, polyethylene glycol 20000, polyethylene glycol 8000, sucrose, titanium dioxide, vitamin E preparation, seal coating agent opaglos clear NA 7150, and imprinting ink opacode red (S-1-15052). The 2 mg dosage strength also contains iron oxide red and iron oxide yellow.

Seal coating agent opaglos clear NA 7150 contains, acetylated monoglyceride, industrial methylated spirit 74 OP, povidone, and shellac.

Imprinting ink opacode red (S-1-15052) contains, ammonium hydroxide, FD&C Red # 40, propylene glycol, shellac glaze, and titanium dioxide.

12 Clinical Pharmacology ⮝

12.1 Mechanism of Action

Sirolimus inhibits T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation that occurs in response to antigenic and cytokine (Interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, and IL-15) stimulation by a mechanism that is distinct from that of other immunosuppressants. Sirolimus also inhibits antibody production. In cells, sirolimus binds to the immunophilin, FK Binding Protein-12 (FKBP-12), to generate an immunosuppressive complex. The sirolimus:FKBP-12 complex has no effect on calcineurin activity. This complex binds to and inhibits the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a key regulatory kinase. This inhibition suppresses cytokine-driven T-cell proliferation, inhibiting the progression from the G 1 to the S phase of the cell cycle.

Studies in experimental models show that sirolimus prolongs allograft (kidney, heart, skin, islet, small bowel, pancreatico-duodenal, and bone marrow) survival in mice, rats, pigs, and/or primates. Sirolimus reverses acute rejection of heart and kidney allografts in rats and prolongs the graft survival in presensitized rats. In some studies, the immunosuppressive effect of sirolimus lasts up to 6 months after discontinuation of therapy. This tolerization effect is alloantigen-specific.

In rodent models of autoimmune disease, sirolimus suppresses immune-mediated events associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, collagen-induced arthritis, autoimmune type I diabetes, autoimmune myocarditis, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, graft-versus-host disease, and autoimmune uveoretinitis.

12.2 Pharmacodynamics

Orally-administered sirolimus, at doses of 2 mg/day and 5 mg/day, significantly reduced the incidence of organ rejection in low-to moderate-immunologic risk renal transplant patients at 6 months following transplantation compared with either azathioprine or placebo [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. There was no demonstrable efficacy advantage of a daily maintenance dose of 5 mg with a loading dose of 15 mg over a daily maintenance dose of 2 mg with a loading dose of 6 mg. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be used to maintain sirolimus drug levels within the target-range [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

12.3 Pharmacokinetics

Sirolimus pharmacokinetics activity have been determined following oral administration in healthy subjects, pediatric patients, hepatically impaired patients, and renal transplant patients.

The pharmacokinetic parameters of sirolimus in low- to moderate-immunologic risk adult renal transplant patients following multiple dosing with sirolimus 2 mg daily, in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids, is summarized in Table 4.

TABLE 4: MEAN SD STEADY STATE SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS IN LOW- TO MODERATE-IMMUNOLOGIC RISK ADULT RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS FOLLOWING SIROLIMUS 2 MG DAILY *,

	Multiple Dose (daily dose)
	Solution	Tablets
* In presence of cyclosporine administered 4 hours before sirolimus dosing. Based on data collected at months 1 and 3 post-transplantation. Average Cmin over 6 months.
C max (ng/mL)	14.4 5.3	15 4.9
t max (hr)	2.1 0.8	3.5 2.4
AUC (ng h/mL)	194 78	230 67
C min (ng/mL)	7.1 3.5	7.6 3.1
CL/F (mL/h/kg)	173 50	139 63

Whole blood trough sirolimus concentrations, as measured by LC/MS/MS in renal transplant patients, were significantly correlated with AUC ,ss. Upon repeated, twice-daily administration without an initial loading dose in a multiple-dose study, the average trough concentration of sirolimus increases approximately 2- to 3-fold over the initial 6 days of therapy, at which time steady-state is reached. A loading dose of 3 times the maintenance dose will provide near steady-state concentrations within 1 day in most patients [see Dosage and Administration (2.3, 2.5), Warning and Precautions (5.16)].

Absorption
Following administration of sirolimus oral solution, the mean times to peak concentration (t max) of sirolimus are approximately 1 hour and 2 hours in healthy subjects and renal transplant patients, respectively. The systemic availability of sirolimus is low, and was estimated to be approximately 14% after the administration of sirolimus oral solution. In healthy subjects, the mean bioavailability of sirolimus after administration of the tablet is approximately 27% higher relative to the solution. Sirolimus tablets are not bioequivalent to the solution; however, clinical equivalence has been demonstrated at the 2 mg dose level. Sirolimus concentrations, following the administration of sirolimus oral solution to stable renal transplant patients, are dose-proportional between 3 and 12 mg/m 2.

Food Effects
To minimize variability in sirolimus concentrations, both sirolimus oral solution and tablets should be taken consistently with or without food [see Dosage and Administration (2)]. In healthy subjects, a high-fat meal (861.8 kcal, 54.9% kcal from fat) increased the mean total exposure (AUC) of sirolimus by 23 to 35%, compared with fasting. The effect of food on the mean sirolimus C max was inconsistent depending on the sirolimus dosage form evaluated.

Distribution
The mean ( SD) blood-to-plasma ratio of sirolimus was 36 18 in stable renal allograft patients, indicating that sirolimus is extensively partitioned into formed blood elements. The mean volume of distribution (Vss/F) of sirolimus is 12 8 L/kg. Sirolimus is extensively bound (approximately 92%) to human plasma proteins, mainly serum albumin (97%), 1-acid glycoprotein, and lipoproteins.

Metabolism
Sirolimus is a substrate for both CYP3A4 and P-gp. Sirolimus is extensively metabolized in the intestinal wall and liver and undergoes counter-transport from enterocytes of the small intestine into the gut lumen. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-gp increase sirolimus concentrations. Inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp decrease sirolimus concentrations [see Warnings and Precautions (5.18) and Drug Interactions (7)]. Sirolimus is extensively metabolized by O-demethylation and/or hydroxylation. Seven (7) major metabolites, including hydroxy, demethyl, and hydroxydemethyl, are identifiable in whole blood. Some of these metabolites are also detectable in plasma, fecal, and urine samples. Sirolimus is the major component in human whole blood and contributes to more than 90% of the immunosuppressive activity.

Excretion
After a single dose of [ 14C] sirolimus oral solution in healthy volunteers, the majority (91%) of radioactivity was recovered from the feces, and only a minor amount (2.2%) was excreted in urine. The mean SD terminal elimination half life (t ) of sirolimus after multiple dosing in stable renal transplant patients was estimated to be about 62 16 hours.

Sirolimus Concentrations (Chromatographic Equivalent) Observed in Phase 3 Clinical Studies
The following sirolimus concentrations (chromatographic equivalent) were observed in phase 3 clinical studies for prophylaxis of organ rejection in de novo renal transplant patients [see Clinical Studies (14)].

TABLE 5: SIROLIMUS WHOLE BLOOD TROUGH CONCENTRATIONS OBSERVED IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS ENROLLED IN PHASE 3 STUDIES

Patient Population (Study number)	Treatment	Year 1		Year 3
		Mean (ng/mL)	10 th 90 th percentiles (ng/mL)	Mean (ng/mL)	10 th 90 th percentiles (ng/mL)
* Months 4 through 12 Up to Week 2; observed CsA Cmin was 217 (56 432) ng/mL Week 2 to Week 26; observed CsA Cmin range was 174 (71 288) ng/mL Week 26 to Week 52; observed CsA Cmin was 136 (54.5 218) ng/mL
Low-to-moderate risk (Studies 1 & 2)	Sirolimus (2 mg/day) + CsA	7.2	3.6 to 11
	Sirolimus (5 mg/day) + CsA	14	8 to 22
Low-to-moderate risk (Study 3)	Sirolimus + CsA	8.6	5 to 13 *	9.1	5.4 to 14
	Sirolimus alone	19	14 to 22 *	16	11 to 22
High risk (Study 4)	Sirolimus + CsA	15.7	5.4 to 27.3
		11.8	6.2 to 16.9
		11.5	6.3 to 17.3

The withdrawal of cyclosporine and concurrent increases in sirolimus trough concentrations to steady-state required approximately 6 weeks. Following cyclosporine withdrawal, larger sirolimus doses were required due to the absence of the inhibition of sirolimus metabolism and transport by cyclosporine and to achieve higher target sirolimus trough concentrations during concentration-controlled administration [see Dosage and Administration (2.1), Drug Interactions (7.1)].

Pharmacokinetics in Specific Populations

Hepatic Impairment
Sirolimus was administered as a single, oral dose to subjects with normal hepatic function and to patients with Child-Pugh classification A (mild), B (moderate), or C (severe) hepatic impairment. Compared with the values in the normal hepatic function group, the patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment had 43%, 94%, and 189% higher mean values for sirolimus AUC, respectively, with no statistically significant differences in mean C max. As the severity of hepatic impairment increased, there were steady increases in mean sirolimus t 1/2, and decreases in the mean sirolimus clearance normalized for body weight (CL/F/kg).

The maintenance dose of sirolimus should be reduced by approximately one third in patients with mild- to- moderate hepatic impairment and by approximately one half in patients with severe hepatic impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)]. It is not necessary to modify the sirolimus loading dose in patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment. Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary in all patients with hepatic impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.7)].

Renal Impairment
The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus is not known. However, there is minimal (2.2%) renal excretion of the drug or its metabolites in healthy volunteers. The loading and the maintenance doses of sirolimus need not be adjusted in patients with renal impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.8)].

Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients
Sirolimus pharmacokinetic data were collected in concentration-controlled trials of pediatric renal transplant patients who were also receiving cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The target ranges for trough concentrations were either 10 to 20 ng/mL for the 21 children receiving tablets, or 5 to 15 ng/mL for the one child receiving oral solution. The children aged 6 to 11 years (n = 8) received mean SD doses of 1.75 0.71 mg/day (0.064 0.018 mg/kg, 1.65 0.43 mg/m 2). The children aged 12 to 18 years (n = 14) received mean SD doses of 2.79 1.25 mg/day (0.053 0.0150 mg/kg, 1.86 0.61 mg/m 2). At the time of sirolimus blood sampling for pharmacokinetic evaluation, the majority (80%) of these pediatric patients received the sirolimus dose at 16 hours after the once-daily cyclosporine dose. See Table 6 below.

TABLE 6: SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS (MEAN SD) IN PEDIATRIC RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS (MULTIPLE-DOSE CONCENTRATION CONTROL) *,

Age	n	Body weight	C max,ss	t max,ss	C min,ss	AUC ,ss	CL/F	CL/F
(y)		(kg)	(ng/mL)	(h)	(ng/mL)	(ng h/mL)	(mL/h/kg)	(L/h/m 2)
* Sirolimus co-administered with cyclosporine oral solution [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral Oral Solution) and/or cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules). As measured by Liquid Chromatographic/Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method (LC/MS/MS) Oral-dose clearance adjusted by either body weight (kg) or body surface area (m2).
6 to 11	8	27 10	22.1 8.9	5.88 4.05	10.6 4.3	356 127	214 129	5.4 2.8
12 to 18	14	52 15	34.5 12.2	2.7 1.5	14.7 8.6	466 236	136 57	4.7 1.9

Table 7 below summarizes pharmacokinetic data obtained in pediatric dialysis patients with chronically impaired renal function.

TABLE 7: SIROLIMUS PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS (MEAN SD) IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE MAINTAINED ON HEMODIALYSIS OR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (1, 3, 9, 15 mg/m 2 SINGLE DOSE) *

Age Group (y)	n	t max (h)	t 1/2 (h)	CL/F/WT (mL/h/kg)
* All subjects received sirolimus oral solution.
5 to 11	9	1.1 0.5	71 40	580 450
12 to 18	11	0.79 0.17	55 18	450 232

Geriatric
Clinical studies of sirolimus did not include a sufficient number of patients >65 years of age to determine whether they will respond differently than younger patients. After the administration of sirolimus oral solution or tablets, sirolimus trough concentration data in renal transplant patients >65 years of age were similar to those in the adult population 18 to 65 years of age.

Gender
Sirolimus clearance in males was 12% lower than that in females; male subjects had a significantly longer t 1/2 than did female subjects (72.3 hours versus 61.3 hours). Dose adjustments based on gender are not recommended.

Race
In the phase 3 trials for the prophylaxis of organ rejection following renal transplantation using sirolimus solution or tablets and cyclosporine oral solution [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral Oral Solution) and/or cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED] (e.g., Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules) [see Clinical Studies (14)], there were no significant differences in mean trough sirolimus concentrations over time between Black (n = 190) and non-Black (n = 852) patients during the first 6 months after transplantation.

Drug-Drug Interactions
Sirolimus is known to be a substrate for both cytochrome CYP3A4 and P-gp. The pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and concomitantly administered drugs is discussed below. Drug interaction studies have not been conducted with drugs other than those described below.

Cyclosporine: Cyclosporine is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp. Sirolimus should be taken 4 hours after administration of cyclosporine oral solution (MODIFIED) and/or cyclosporine capsules (MODIFIED). Sirolimus concentrations may decrease when cyclosporine is discontinued, unless the sirolimus dose is increased [see Dosage and Administration (2.2), Drug Interactions (7.1)].

In a single-dose drug-drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers were administered 10 mg sirolimus tablets either simultaneously or 4 hours after a 300-mg dose of Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). For simultaneous administration, mean C max and AUC were increased by 512% and 148%, respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 4 hours after cyclosporine administration, sirolimus C max and AUC were both increased by only 33% compared with administration of sirolimus alone.

In a single dose drug-drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers were administered 10 mg sirolimus oral solution either simultaneously or 4 hours after a 300 mg dose of Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). For simultaneous administration, the mean C max and AUC of sirolimus, following simultaneous administration were increased by 116% and 230%, respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 4 hours after Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) administration, sirolimus C max and AUC were increased by only 37% and 80%, respectively, compared with administration of sirolimus alone.

In a single-dose cross-over drug-drug interaction study, 33 healthy volunteers received 5 mg sirolimus oral solution alone, 2 hours before, and 2 hours after a 300 mg dose of Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). When given 2 hours before Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) administration, sirolimus C max and AUC were comparable to those with administration of sirolimus alone. However, when given 2 hours after, the mean C max and AUC of sirolimus were increased by 126% and 141%, respectively, relative to administration of sirolimus alone.

Mean cyclosporine C max and AUC were not significantly affected when sirolimus oral solution was given simultaneously or when administered 4 hours after Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]). However, after multiple-dose administration of sirolimus given 4 hours after Neoral in renal post-transplant patients over 6 months, cyclosporine oral-dose clearance was reduced, and lower doses of Neoral Soft Gelatin Capsules (cyclosporine capsules [MODIFIED]) were needed to maintain target cyclosporine concentration.

In a multiple-dose study in 150 psoriasis patients, sirolimus 0.5, 1.5, and 3 mg/m 2/day was administered simultaneously with Sandimmune Oral Solution (cyclosporine Oral Solution) 1.25 mg/kg/day. The increase in average sirolimus trough concentrations ranged between 67% to 86% relative to when sirolimus was administered without cyclosporine. The intersubject variability (% CV) for sirolimus trough concentrations ranged from 39.7% to 68.7%. There was no significant effect of multiple-dose sirolimus on cyclosporine trough concentrations following Sandimmune Oral Solution (cyclosporine oral solution) administration. However, the % CV was higher (range 85.9% to 165%) than those from previous studies.

Diltiazem: Diltiazem is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; sirolimus concentrations should be monitored and a dose adjustment may be necessary [see Drug Interactions (7.4)]. The simultaneous oral administration of 10 mg of sirolimus oral solution and 120 mg of diltiazem to 18 healthy volunteers significantly affected the bioavailability of sirolimus. Sirolimus C max, t max, and AUC were increased 1.4-, 1.3-, and 1.6-fold, respectively. Sirolimus did not affect the pharmacokinetics of either diltiazem or its metabolites desacetyldiltiazem and desmethyldiltiazem.

Erythromycin: Erythromycin is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; co-administration of sirolimus oral solution or tablets and erythromycin is not recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.18), Drug Interactions (7.2)]. The simultaneous oral administration of 2 mg daily of sirolimus oral solution and 800 mg q 8h of erythromycin as erythromycin ethylsuccinate tablets at steady state to 24 healthy volunteers significantly affected the bioavailability of sirolimus and erythromycin. Sirolimus C max and AUC were increased 4.4- and 4.2-fold respectively and t max was increased by 0.4 hr. Erythromycin C max and AUC were increased 1.6- and 1.7-fold, respectively, and t max was increased by 0.3 hr.

Ketoconazole: Ketoconazole is a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; co-administration of sirolimus oral solution or tablets and ketoconazole is not recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.18), Drug Interactions (7.2)]. Multiple-dose ketoconazole administration significantly affected the rate and extent of absorption and sirolimus exposure after administration of sirolimus oral solution, as reflected by increases in sirolimus C max, t max, and AUC of 4.3-fold, 38%, and 10.9-fold, respectively. However, the terminal t of sirolimus was not changed. Single-dose sirolimus did not affect steady-state 12-hour plasma ketoconazole concentrations.

Rifampin: Rifampin is a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and P-gp; co-administration of sirolimus oral solution or tablets and rifampin is not recommended. In patients where rifampin is indicated, alternative therapeutic agents with less enzyme induction potential should be considered [see Warnings and Precautions (5.18), Drug Interactions (7.2)]. Pretreatment of 14 healthy volunteers with multiple doses of rifampin, 600 mg daily for 14 days, followed by a single 20-mg dose of sirolimus oral solution, greatly decreased sirolimus AUC and C max by about 82% and 71%, respectively.

Verapamil: Verapamil is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-gp; sirolimus concentrations should be monitored and a dose adjustment may be necessary; [see Drug Interactions (7.4)]. The simultaneous oral administration of 2 mg daily of sirolimus oral solution and 180 mg q 12h of verapamil at steady state to 25 healthy volunteers significantly affected the bioavailability of sirolimus and verapamil. Sirolimus C max and AUC were increased 2.3- and 2.2-fold, respectively, without substantial change in t max. The C max and AUC of the pharmacologically active S(-) enantiomer of verapamil were both increased 1.5-fold and t max was decreased by 1.2 hr.

Drugs Which May Be Co-administered Without Dose Adjustment

Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions were not observed in studies of drugs listed below. Sirolimus and these drugs may be co-administered without dose adjustments.

• Acyclovir
• Atorvastatin
• Digoxin
• Glyburide
• Nifedipine
• Norgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (Lo/Ovral )
• Prednisolone
• Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Bactrim )

Other Drug-Drug Interactions

Co-administration of sirolimus with other known strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as voriconazole, itraconazole, telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or other known strong inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp (such as rifabutin) is not recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.18), Drug Interactions (7.2)]. In patients in whom strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 are indicated, alternative therapeutic agents with less potential for inhibition or induction of CYP3A4 should be considered.

Care should be exercised when drugs or other substances that are substrates and/or inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 are administered concomitantly with sirolimus. Other drugs that have the potential to increase sirolimus blood concentrations include (but are not limited to):

• Calcium channel blockers: nicardipine.
• Antifungal agents: clotrimazole, fluconazole.
• Antibiotics: troleandomycin.
• Gastrointestinal prokinetic agents: cisapride, metoclopramide.
• Other drugs: bromocriptine, cimetidine, danazol, protease inhibitors (e.g., for HIV and hepatitis C that include drugs such as ritonavir, indinavir, boceprevir, and telaprevir).

Other drugs that have the potential to decrease sirolimus concentrations include (but are not limited to):

• Anticonvulsants: carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin.
• Antibiotics: rifapentine.

Other Drug-Food Interactions

Grapefruit juice reduces the CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism. Grapefruit juice must not be taken with sirolimus [see Drug Interactions (7.3)].

Drug-Herb Interactions

St. John's Wort ( Hypericum perforatum) induces CYP3A4 and P-gp. Since sirolimus is a substrate for both cytochrome CYP3A4 and P-gp, there is the potential that the use of St. John's Wort in patients receiving sirolimus could result in reduced sirolimus concentrations [see Drug Interactions (7.4)].

13 Nonclinical Toxicology ⮝

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

Carcinogenicity studies were conducted in mice and rats. In an 86-week female mouse study at sirolimus doses 30 to 120 times higher than the 2 mg daily clinical dose (adjusted for body surface area), there was a statistically significant increase in malignant lymphoma at all dose levels compared with controls. In a second mouse study at dosages that were approximately 3 to 16 times the clinical dose (adjusted for body surface area), hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma in males were considered sirolimus-related. In the 104-week rat study at dosages equal to or lower than the clinical dose of 2 mg daily (adjusted for body surface area), there were no significant findings.

Sirolimus was not genotoxic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay, the Chinese hamster ovary cell chromosomal aberration assay, the mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay, or the in vivo mouse micronucleus assay.

Fertility was diminished slightly in both male and female rats following oral administration of sirolimus at doses approximately 10 times or 2 times, respectively, the clinical dose of 2 mg daily (adjusted for body surface area). In male rats, atrophy of testes, epididymides, prostate, seminiferous tubules and/or reduction in sperm counts were observed. In female rats, reduced size of ovaries and uteri was observed. Reduction of sperm count in male rats was reversible upon cessation of dosing in one study. Testicular tubular degeneration was also seen in a 4-week intravenous study of sirolimus in monkeys at doses that were approximately equal to the clinical dose (adjusted for body surface area).

14 Clinical Studies ⮝

14.1 Prophylaxis of Organ Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients

Sirolimus Oral Solution
The safety and efficacy of sirolimus oral solution for the prevention of organ rejection following renal transplantation were assessed in two randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trials. These studies compared two dose levels of sirolimus oral solution (2 mg and 5 mg, once daily) with azathioprine (Study 1) or placebo (Study 2) when administered in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Study 1 was conducted in the United States at 38 sites. Seven hundred nineteen (719) patients were enrolled in this trial and randomized following transplantation; 284 were randomized to receive sirolimus oral solution 2 mg/day; 274 were randomized to receive sirolimus oral solution 5 mg/day, and 161 to receive azathioprine 2 to 3 mg/kg/day. Study 2 was conducted in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the United States, at a total of 34 sites. Five hundred seventy-six (576) patients were enrolled in this trial and randomized before transplantation; 227 were randomized to receive sirolimus oral solution 2 mg/day; 219 were randomized to receive sirolimus oral solution 5 mg/day, and 130 to receive placebo. In both studies, the use of anti-lymphocyte antibody induction therapy was prohibited. In both studies, the primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of efficacy failure in the first 6 months after transplantation. Efficacy failure was defined as the first occurrence of an acute rejection episode (confirmed by biopsy), graft loss, or death.

The tables below summarize the results of the primary efficacy analyses from these trials. Sirolimus oral solution, at doses of 2 mg/day and 5 mg/day, significantly reduced the incidence of efficacy failure (statistically significant at the <0.025 level; nominal significance level adjusted for multiple [2] dose comparisons) at 6 months following transplantation compared with both azathioprine and placebo.

TABLE 8: INCIDENCE (%) OF EFFICACY FAILURE AT 6 AND 24 MONTHS FOR STUDY 1 *

Parameter	Sirolimus Oral Solution 2 mg/day (n = 284)	Sirolimus Oral Solution 5 mg/day (n = 274)	Azathioprine 2 to 3 mg/kg/day (n = 161)
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Primary endpoint.
Efficacy failure at 6 months	18.7	16.8	32.3
Components of efficacy failure
Biopsy-proven acute rejection	16.5	11.3	29.2
Graft loss	1.1	2.9	2.5
Death	0.7	1.8	0
Lost to follow-up	0.4	0.7	0.6
Efficacy failure at 24 months	32.8	25.9	36
Components of efficacy failure
Biopsy-proven acute rejection	23.6	17.5	32.3
Graft loss	3.9	4.7	3.1
Death	4.2	3.3	0
Lost to follow-up	1.1	0.4	0.6

TABLE 9: INCIDENCE (%) OF EFFICACY FAILURE AT 6 AND 36 MONTHS FOR STUDY 2 *

Parameter	Sirolimus Oral Solution 2 mg/day (n = 227)	Sirolimus Oral Solution 5 mg/day (n = 219)	Placebo (n = 130)
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Primary endpoint.
Efficacy failure at 6 months	30	25.6	47.7
Components of efficacy failure
Biopsy-proven acute rejection	24.7	19.2	41.5
Graft loss	3.1	3.7	3.9
Death	2.2	2.7	2.3
Lost to follow-up	0	0	0
Efficacy failure at 36 months	44.1	41.6	54.6
Components of efficacy failure
Biopsy-proven acute rejection	32.2	27.4	43.9
Graft loss	6.2	7.3	4.6
Death	5.7	5.9	5.4
Lost to follow-up	0	0.9	0.8

Patient and graft survival at 1 year were co-primary endpoints. The following table shows graft and patient survival at 1 and 2 years in Study 1, and 1 and 3 years in Study 2. The graft and patient survival rates were similar in patients treated with sirolimus and comparator-treated patients.

TABLE 10: GRAFT AND PATIENT SURVIVAL (%) FOR STUDY 1 (12 AND 24 MONTHS) AND STUDY 2 (12 AND 36 MONTHS) *

Parameter	Sirolimus Oral Solution 2 mg/day	Sirolimus Oral Solution 5 mg/day	Azathioprine 2 to 3 mg/kg/day	Placebo
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment.
Study 1	(n = 284)	(n = 274)	(n = 161)
Graft survival
Month 12	94.7	92.7	93.8
Month 24	85.2	89.1	90.1
Patient survival
Month 12	97.2	96	98.1
Month 24	92.6	94.9	96.3
Study 2	(n = 227)	(n = 219)		(n = 130)
Graft survival
Month 12	89.9	90.9		87.7
Month 36	81.1	79.9		80.8
Patient survival
Month 12	96.5	95		94.6
Month 36	90.3	89.5		90.8

The reduction in the incidence of first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes in patients treated with sirolimus compared with the control groups included a reduction in all grades of rejection.

In Study 1, which was prospectively stratified by race within center, efficacy failure was similar for sirolimus oral solution 2 mg/day and lower for sirolimus oral solution 5 mg/day compared with azathioprine in Black patients. In Study 2, which was not prospectively stratified by race, efficacy failure was similar for both sirolimus oral solution doses compared with placebo in Black patients. The decision to use the higher dose of sirolimus oral solution in Black patients must be weighed against the increased risk of dose-dependent adverse events that were observed with the sirolimus oral solution 5-mg dose [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

TABLE 11: PERCENTAGE OF EFFICACY FAILURE BY RACE AT 6 MONTHS *

Parameter	Sirolimus Oral Solution 2 mg/day	Sirolimus Oral Solution 5 mg/day	Azathioprine 2 to 3 mg/kg/day	Placebo
* Patients received cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment.
Study 1
Black (n = 166)	34.9 (n = 63)	18 (n = 61)	33.3 (n = 42)
Non-Black (n = 553)	14 (n = 221)	16.4 (n = 213)	31.9 (n = 119)
Study 2
Black (n = 66)	30.8 (n = 26)	33.7 (n = 27)		38.5 (n = 13)
Non-Black (n = 510)	29.9 (n = 201)	24.5 (n = 192)		48.7 (n = 117)

Mean glomerular filtration rates (GFR) post-transplant were calculated by using the Nankivell equation at 12 and 24 months for Study 1, and 12 and 36 months for Study 2. Mean GFR was lower in patients treated with cyclosporine and sirolimus oral solution compared with those treated with cyclosporine and the respective azathioprine or placebo control.

TABLE 12: OVERALL CALCULATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATES (Mean SEM, cc/min) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION POST-TRANSPLANT *

Parameter	Sirolimus Oral Solution 2 mg/day	Sirolimus Oral Solution 5 mg/day	Azathioprine 2 to 3 mg/kg/day	Placebo
* Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Patients who had a graft loss were included in the analysis with GFR set to 0.
Study 1
Month 12	57.4 1.3 (n = 269)	54.6 1.3 (n = 248)	64.1 1.6 (n = 149)
Month 24	58.4 1.5 (n = 221)	52.6 1.5 (n = 222)	62.4 1.9 (n = 132)
Study 2
Month 12	52.4 1.5 (n = 211)	51.5 1.5 (n = 199)		58.0 2.1 (n = 117)
Month 36	48.1 1.8 (n = 183)	46.1 2.0 (n = 177)		53.4 2.7 (n = 102)

Within each treatment group in Studies 1 and 2, mean GFR at one-year post-transplant was lower in patients who experienced at least one episode of biopsy-proven acute rejection, compared with those who did not.

Renal function should be monitored, and appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppressive regimen should be considered in patients with elevated or increasing serum creatinine levels [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)].

Sirolimus Tablets
The safety and efficacy of sirolimus oral solution and sirolimus tablets for the prevention of organ rejection following renal transplantation were demonstrated to be clinically equivalent in a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

14.2 Cyclosporine Withdrawal Study in Renal Transplant Patients

The safety and efficacy of sirolimus as a maintenance regimen were assessed following cyclosporine withdrawal at 3 to 4 months after renal transplantation. Study 3 was a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial conducted at 57 centers in Australia, Canada, and Europe. Five hundred twenty-five (525) patients were enrolled. All patients in this study received the tablet formulation. This study compared patients who were administered sirolimus, cyclosporine, and corticosteroids continuously with patients who received this same standardized therapy for the first 3 months after transplantation (pre-randomization period) followed by the withdrawal of cyclosporine. During cyclosporine withdrawal, the sirolimus dosages were adjusted to achieve targeted sirolimus whole blood trough concentration ranges (16 to 24 ng/mL until month 12, then 12 to 20 ng/mL thereafter, expressed as chromatographic assay values). At 3 months, 430 patients were equally randomized to either continue sirolimus with cyclosporine therapy or to receive sirolimus as a maintenance regimen following cyclosporine withdrawal.

Eligibility for randomization included no Banff Grade 3 acute rejection or vascular rejection episode in the 4 weeks before random assignment, serum creatinine 4.5 mg/dL, and adequate renal function to support cyclosporine withdrawal (in the opinion of the investigator). The primary efficacy endpoint was graft survival at 12 months after transplantation. Secondary efficacy endpoints were the rate of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, patient survival, incidence of efficacy failure (defined as the first occurrence of either biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death), and treatment failure (defined as the first occurrence of either discontinuation, acute rejection, graft loss, or death).

The following table summarizes the resulting graft and patient survival at 12, 24, and 36 months for this trial. At 12, 24, and 36 months, graft and patient survival were similar for both groups.

TABLE 13: GRAFT AND PATIENT SURVIVAL (%): STUDY 3 *

Parameter	Sirolimus with Cyclosporine Therapy (n = 215)	Sirolimus Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal (n = 215)
* Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Primary efficacy endpoint. Survival including loss to follow-up as an event. Initial planned duration of the study.
Graft Survival
Month 12	95.3	97.2
Month 24	91.6	94
Month 36	87	91.6
Patient Survival
Month 12	97.2	98.1
Month 24	94.4	95.8
Month 36	91.6	94

The following table summarizes the results of first biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 and 36 months. There was a significant difference in first biopsy-proven rejection rates between the two groups after randomization and through 12 months. Most of the post-randomization acute rejections occurred in the first 3 months following randomization.

TABLE 14: INCIDENCE OF FIRST BIOPSY-PROVEN ACUTE REJECTION (%) BY TREATMENT GROUP AT 36 MONTHS: STUDY 3 *,

Period	Sirolimus with Cyclosporine Therapy (n = 215)	Sirolimus Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal (n = 215)
* Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. All patients received corticosteroids. Randomization occurred at 3 months 2 weeks.
Pre-randomization	9.3	10.2
Post-randomization through 12 months	4.2	9.8
Post-randomization from 12 to 36 months	1.4	0.5
Post-randomization through 36 months	5.6	10.2
Total at 36 months	14.9	20.5

Patients receiving renal allografts with 4 HLA mismatches experienced significantly higher rates of acute rejection following randomization to the cyclosporine withdrawal group, compared with patients who continued cyclosporine (15.3% versus 3%). Patients receiving renal allografts with 3 HLA mismatches demonstrated similar rates of acute rejection between treatment groups (6.8% versus 7.7%) following randomization.

The following table summarizes the mean calculated GFR in Study 3 (cyclosporine withdrawal study).

TABLE 15: CALCULATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATES (mL/min) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION AT 12, 24, AND 36 MONTHS POST-TRANSPLANT: STUDY 3 *, ,

Parameter	Sirolimus with Cyclosporine Therapy	Sirolimus Following Cyclosporine Withdrawal
* Includes patients who prematurely discontinued treatment. Patients who had a graft loss were included in the analysis and had their GFR set to 0. All patients received corticosteroids.
Month 12
Mean SEM	53.2 1.5 (n = 208)	59.3 1.5 (n = 203)
Month 24
Mean SEM	48.4 1.7 (n = 203)	58.4 1.6 (n = 201)
Month 36
Mean SEM	47.0 1.8 (n = 196)	58.5 1.9 (n = 199)

The mean GFR at 12, 24, and 36 months, calculated by the Nankivell equation, was significantly higher for patients receiving sirolimus as a maintenance regimen following cyclosporine withdrawal than for those in the sirolimus with cyclosporine therapy group. Patients who had an acute rejection prior to randomization had a significantly higher GFR following cyclosporine withdrawal compared to those in the sirolimus with cyclosporine group. There was no significant difference in GFR between groups for patients who experienced acute rejection post-randomization.

Although the initial protocol was designed for 36 months, there was a subsequent amendment to extend this study. The results for the cyclosporine withdrawal group at months 48 and 60 were consistent with the results at month 36. Fifty-two percent (112/215) of the patients in the sirolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal group remained on therapy to month 60 and showed sustained GFR.

14.3 High-Immunologic Risk Renal Transplant Patients

Sirolimus was studied in a one-year, clinical trial in high risk patients (Study 4) who were defined as Black transplant recipients and/or repeat renal transplant recipients who lost a previous allograft for immunologic reasons and/or patients with high panel-reactive antibodies (PRA; peak PRA level >80%). Patients received concentration-controlled sirolimus and cyclosporine (MODIFIED), and corticosteroids per local practice. The sirolimus dose was adjusted to achieve target whole blood trough sirolimus concentrations of 10 to 15 ng/mL (chromatographic method) throughout the 12-month study period. The cyclosporine dose was adjusted to achieve target whole blood trough concentrations of 200 to 300 ng/mL through week 2, 150 to 200 ng/mL from week 2 to week 26, and 100 to 150 ng/mL from week 26 to week 52 [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] for the observed trough concentrations ranges. Antibody induction was allowed per protocol as prospectively defined at each transplant center, and was used in 88.4% of patients. The study was conducted at 35 centers in the United States. A total of 224 patients received a transplant and at least one dose of sirolimus and cyclosporine and was comprised of 77.2% Black patients, 24.1% repeat renal transplant recipients, and 13.5% patients with high PRA. Efficacy was assessed with the following endpoints, measured at 12 months: efficacy failure (defined as the first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death), first occurrence of graft loss or death, and renal function as measured by the calculated GFR using the Nankivell formula. The table below summarizes the result of these endpoints.

TABLE 16: EFFICACY FAILURE, GRAFT LOSS OR DEATH AND CALCULATED GLOMERULAR FUNCTION RATES (mL/min) BY NANKIVELL EQUATION AT 12 MONTHS POST-TRANSPLANT: STUDY 4

Parameter	Sirolimus with Cyclosporine, Corticosteroids (n = 224)
* Calculated glomerular filtration rate by Nankivell equation. Patients who had graft loss were included in this analysis with GFR set to 0.
Efficacy Failure (%)	23.2
Graft Loss or Death (%)	9.8
Renal Function (mean SEM) *,	52.6 1.6 (n = 222)

Patient survival at 12 months was 94.6%. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 17.4% and the majority of the episodes of acute rejection were mild in severity.

14.4 Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus in Maintenance Renal Transplant Patients

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus was assessed in maintenance renal transplant patients 6 months to 10 years post-transplant (Study 5). This study was a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial conducted at 111 centers globally, including US and Europe, and was intended to show that renal function was improved by conversion from CNI to sirolimus. Eight hundred thirty (830) patients were enrolled and stratified by baseline calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR, 20 to 40 mL/min versus greater than 40 mL/min). In this trial there was no benefit associated with conversion with regard to improvement in renal function and a greater incidence of proteinuria in the sirolimus conversion arm. In addition, enrollment of patients with baseline calculated GFR less than 40 mL/min was discontinued due to a higher rate of serious adverse events, including pneumonia, acute rejection, graft loss and death [see Adverse Reactions (6.4)].

This study compared renal transplant patients (6 to 120 months after transplantation) who were converted from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus, with patients who continued to receive calcineurin inhibitors. Concomitant immunosuppressive medications included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA), and corticosteroids. Sirolimus was initiated with a single loading dose of 12 to 20 mg, after which dosing was adjusted to achieve a target sirolimus whole blood trough concentration of 8 to 20 ng/mL (chromatographic method). The efficacy endpoint was calculated GFR at 12 months post-randomization. Additional endpoints included biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, and death. Findings in the patient stratum with baseline calculated GFR greater than 40 mL/min (sirolimus conversion, n = 497; CNI continuation, n = 246) are summarized below: There was no clinically or statistically significant improvement in Nankivell GFR compared to baseline.

TABLE 17: RENAL FUNCTION IN STABLE RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS IN PATIENTS WITH BASELINE GFR >40 mL/min THE SIROLIMUS CONVERSION STUDY (STUDY 5)

Parameter	Sirolimus conversion N=496	CNI continuation N=245	Difference (95% CI)
GFR mL/min (Nankivell) at 1 year	59	57.7	1.3 (-1.1, 3.7)
GFR mL/min (Nankivell) at 2 year	53.7	52.1	1.6 (-1.4, 4.6)

The rates of acute rejection, graft loss, and death were similar at 1 and 2 years. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently during the first 6 months after sirolimus conversion. The rates of pneumonia were significantly higher for the sirolimus conversion group.

While the mean and median values for urinary protein to creatinine ratio were similar between treatment groups at baseline, significantly higher mean and median levels of urinary protein excretion were seen in the sirolimus conversion arm at 1 year and at 2 years, as shown in the table below [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9)]. In addition, when compared to patients who continued to receive calcineurin inhibitors, a higher percentage of patients had urinary protein to creatinine ratios >1 at 1 and 2 years after sirolimus conversion. This difference was seen in both patients who had a urinary protein to creatinine ratio 1 and those who had a protein to creatinine ratio >1 at baseline. More patients in the sirolimus conversion group developed nephrotic range proteinuria, as defined by a urinary protein to creatinine ratio >3.5 (46/482 [9.5%] versus 9/239 [3.8%]), even when the patients with baseline nephrotic range proteinuria were excluded. The rate of nephrotic range proteinuria was significantly higher in the sirolimus conversion group compared to the calcineurin inhibitor continuation group with baseline urinary protein to creatinine ratio >1 (13/29 versus 1/14), excluding patients with baseline nephrotic range proteinuria.

TABLE 18: MEAN AND MEDIAN VALUES FOR URINARY PROTEIN TO CREATININE RATIO (mg/mg) BETWEEN TREATMENT GROUPS AT BASELINE, 1 AND 2 YEARS IN THE STRATUM WITH BASELINE CALCULATED GFR >40 mL/min

Study period	Sirolimus Conversion			CNI Continuation
	N	Mean SD	Median	N	Mean SD	Median	p-value
Baseline	410	0.35 0.76	0.13	207	0.28 0.61	0.11	0.381
1 year	423	0.88 1.61	0.31	203	0.37 0.88	0.14	<0.001
2 years	373	0.86 1.48	0.32	190	0.47 0.98	0.13	<0.001

The above information should be taken into account when considering conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in stable renal transplant patients due to the lack of evidence showing that renal function improves following conversion, and the finding of a greater increment in urinary protein excretion, and an increased incidence of treatment-emergent nephrotic range proteinuria following conversion to sirolimus. This was particularly true among patients with existing abnormal urinary protein excretion prior to conversion.

In an open-label, randomized, comparative, multicenter study where kidney transplant patients were either converted from tacrolimus to sirolimus 3 to 5 months post-transplant (sirolimus group) or remained on tacrolimus, there was no significant difference in renal function at 2 years post-transplant. Overall, 44/131 (33.6%) discontinued treatment in the sirolimus group versus 12/123 (9.8%) in the tacrolimus group. More patients reported adverse events 130/131 (99.2%) versus 112/123 (91.1%) and more patients reported discontinuations from the treatment due to adverse events 28/131 (21.4%) versus 4/123 (3.3%) in the sirolimus group compared to the tacrolimus group.

The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was higher for patients in the sirolimus group 11/131 (8.4%) compared to the tacrolimus group 2/123 (1.6%) through 2 years post-transplant. The rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus post-randomization, defined as 30 days or longer of continuous or at least 25 days non-stop (without gap) use of any diabetic treatment after randomization, a fasting glucose 126 mg/dL or a non-fasting glucose 200 mg/dL, was higher in the sirolimus group 15/82 (18.3%) compared to the tacrolimus group 4/72 (5.6%). A greater incidence of proteinuria, was seen in the sirolimus group 19/131 (14.5%) versus 2/123 (1.6%) in the tacrolimus group.

14.5 Conversion from a CNI-based Regimen to a Sirolimus-based Regimen in Liver Transplant Patients

Conversion from a CNI-based regimen to a sirolimus-based regimen was assessed in stable liver transplant patients 6 to 144 months post-transplant. The clinical study was a 2:1 randomized, multi-center, controlled trial conducted at 82 centers globally, including the US and Europe, and was intended to show that renal function was improved by conversion from a CNI to sirolimus without adversely impacting efficacy or safety. A total of 607 patients were enrolled.

The study failed to demonstrate superiority of conversion to a sirolimus-based regimen compared to continuation of a CNI-based regimen in baseline-adjusted GFR, as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault, at 12 months (62 mL/min in the sirolimus conversion group and 63 mL/min in the CNI continuation group). The study also failed to demonstrate non-inferiority, with respect to the composite endpoint consisting of graft loss and death (including patients with missing survival data) in the sirolimus conversion group compared to the CNI continuation group (6.6% versus 5.6%). The number of deaths in the sirolimus conversion group (15/393, 3.8%) was higher than in the CNI continuation group (3/214, 1.4%), although the difference was not statistically significant. The rates of premature study discontinuation (primarily due to adverse events or lack of efficacy), adverse events overall (infections, specifically), and biopsy-proven acute liver graft rejection at 12 months were all significantly greater in the sirolimus conversion group compared to the CNI continuation group.

14.6 Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients

Sirolimus was evaluated in a 36-month, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial at 14 North American centers in pediatric (aged 3 to <18 years) renal transplant patients considered to be at high-immunologic risk for developing chronic allograft nephropathy, defined as a history of one or more acute allograft rejection episodes and/or the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy on a renal biopsy. Seventy-eight (78) subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to sirolimus (sirolimus target concentrations of 5 to 15 ng/mL, by chromatographic assay, n = 53) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor and corticosteroids or to continue calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy (n = 25). The primary endpoint of the study was efficacy failure as defined by the first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death, and the trial was designed to show superiority of sirolimus added to a calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen compared to a calcineurin-inhibitor-based regimen. The cumulative incidence of efficacy failure up to 36 months was 45.3% in the sirolimus group compared to 44% in the control group, and did not demonstrate superiority. There was one death in each group. The use of sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids was associated with an increased risk of deterioration of renal function, serum lipid abnormalities (including, but not limited to, increased serum triglycerides and cholesterol), and urinary tract infections [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)]. This study does not support the addition of sirolimus to calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy in this subpopulation of pediatric renal transplant patients.

15 References ⮝

Clinical Therapeutics, Volume 22, Supplement B, April 2000 [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

16 How Supplied/storage And Handling ⮝

Since sirolimus is not absorbed through the skin, there are no special precautions.

16.2 Sirolimus Tablets

Sirolimus Tablets are available as follows:

• 1 mg, white, triangular shaped tablets imprinted with RD over "53" in red color on one side and plain on the other side.
  They are supplied in unit dose packages of 30 (5 x 6) NDC 68084-915-25

Sirolimus tablets should be stored at 20 to 25 C [See USP Controlled Room Temperature] (68 to 77 F).

FOR YOUR PROTECTION: Do not use if blister is torn or broken.

Package Label. Principal Display Panel ⮝

Sirolimus Tablets, 1 mg Container Label

Unvarnished Area Consists of: 2D Barcode, Lot Number, Expiry Date and Serial Number